The governance of not-for-profit organizations / edited by Edward L. Glaeser. p. cm. — (A National Bureau of Economic Research conference report).
Table of contents
Also, the duties are owed to the company itself, and not to any other entity. Directors must exercise their powers for a proper purpose.
The Governance of Not-For-Profit Firms
While in many instances an improper purpose is readily evident, such as a director looking to feather his or her own nest or divert an investment opportunity to a relative, such breaches usually involve a breach of the director's duty to act in good faith. Greater difficulties arise where the director, while acting in good faith, is serving a purpose that is not regarded by the law as proper.
The case concerned the powers of directors under the articles of association of the company to disenfranchise voting rights attached to shares for failure to properly comply with notice served on the shareholders. The case concerned the power of the directors to issue new shares. An argument that the power to issue shares could only be properly exercised to raise new capital was rejected as too narrow, and it was held that it would be a proper exercise of the director's powers to issue shares to a larger company to ensure the financial stability of the company, or as part of an agreement to exploit mineral rights owned by the company.
But if the sole purpose was to destroy a voting majority, or block a takeover bid, that would be an improper purpose. Not all jurisdictions recognised the "proper purpose" duty as separate from the "good faith" duty however. Directors cannot, without the consent of the company, fetter their discretion in relation to the exercise of their powers, and cannot bind themselves to vote in a particular way at future board meetings.
This does not mean, however, that the board cannot agree to the company entering into a contract which binds the company to a certain course, even if certain actions in that course will require further board approval. The company remains bound, but the directors retain the discretion to vote against taking the future actions although that may involve a breach by the company of the contract that the board previously approved.
As fiduciaries, the directors may not put themselves in a position where their interests and duties conflict with the duties that they owe to the company. The law takes the view that good faith must not only be done, but must be manifestly seen to be done, and zealously patrols the conduct of directors in this regard; and will not allow directors to escape liability by asserting that his decision was in fact well founded. Traditionally, the law has divided conflicts of duty and interest into three sub-categories. By definition, where a director enters into a transaction with a company, there is a conflict between the director's interest to do well for himself out of the transaction and his duty to the company to ensure that the company gets as much as it can out of the transaction.
This rule is so strictly enforced that, even where the conflict of interest or conflict of duty is purely hypothetical, the directors can be forced to disgorge all personal gains arising from it. However, in many jurisdictions the members of the company are permitted to ratify transactions which would otherwise fall foul of this principle. It is also largely accepted in most jurisdictions that this principle can be overridden in the company's constitution. In many countries, there is also a statutory duty to declare interests in relation to any transactions, and the director can be fined for failing to make disclosure.
Directors must not, without the informed consent of the company, use for their own profit the company's assets, opportunities , or information. This prohibition is much less flexible than the prohibition against the transactions with the company, and attempts to circumvent it using provisions in the articles have met with limited success. In Regal Hastings Ltd v Gulliver [] All ER the House of Lords, in upholding what was regarded as a wholly unmeritorious claim by the shareholders, [h] held that:.
And accordingly, the directors were required to disgorge the profits that they made, and the shareholders received their windfall. The decision has been followed in several subsequent cases, [46] and is now regarded as settled law. Directors cannot compete directly with the company without a conflict of interest arising.
Similarly, they should not act as directors of competing companies, as their duties to each company would then conflict with each other. Traditionally, the level of care and skill which has to be demonstrated by a director has been framed largely with reference to the non-executive director. However, this decision was based firmly in the older notions see above that prevailed at the time as to the mode of corporate decision making, and effective control residing in the shareholders; if they elected and put up with an incompetent decision maker, they should not have recourse to complain.
However, a more modern approach has since developed, and in Dorchester Finance Co Ltd v Stebbing [] BCLC the court held that the rule in Equitable Fire related only to skill, and not to diligence. With respect to diligence, what was required was:. More recently, it has been suggested that both the tests of skill and diligence should be assessed objectively and subjectively; in the United Kingdom, the statutory provisions relating to directors' duties in the new Companies Act have been codified on this basis.
In most jurisdictions, the law provides for a variety of remedies in the event of a breach by the directors of their duties:. Historically, directors' duties have been owed almost exclusively to the company and its members, and the board was expected to exercise its powers for the financial benefit of the company. However, more recently there have been attempts to "soften" the position, and provide for more scope for directors to act as good corporate citizens.
Centers and Chairs
For example, in the United Kingdom, the Companies Act requires directors of companies "to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole" and sets out the following six factors regarding a director's duty to promote success:. This represents a considerable departure from the traditional notion that directors' duties are owed only to the company. Previously in the United Kingdom, under the Companies Act , protections for non-member stakeholders were considerably more limited see for example, s.
The changes have therefore been the subject of some criticism. The Sarbanes—Oxley Act of has introduced new standards of accountability on boards of U.
Under the Act, directors risk large fines and prison sentences in the case of accounting crimes. Internal control is now the direct responsibility of directors.
- Working Papers & Publications.
- Handbook For Writing Proposals, Second Edition (Business Skills and Development);
- Debt of Dishonor: A Norse Tale of Betrayal and Redemption.
- Lenition and Contrast: The Functional Consequences of Certain Phonetically Conditioned Sound Changes;
- Frauenrecht (German Edition)!
The vast majority of companies covered by the Act have hired internal auditors to ensure that the company adheres to required standards of internal control. The internal auditors are required by law to report directly to an audit board, consisting of directors more than half of whom are outside directors, one of whom is a "financial expert. The law requires companies listed on the major stock exchanges NYSE, NASDAQ to have a majority of independent directors—directors who are not otherwise employed by the firm or in a business relationship with it.
According to the Corporate Library's study, the average size of publicly traded company's board is 9. According to Investopedia, some analysts think the ideal size is seven. While a board may have several committees, two—the compensation committee and audit committee—are critical and must be made up of at least three independent directors and no inside directors.
Other common committees in boards are nominating and governance. Directorship is a part-time job. A recent National Association of Corporate Directors study found directors averaging just 4. According to John Gillespie, a former investment banker and co-author of a book critical of boards, [62] "Far too much of their time has been for check-the-box and cover-your-behind activities rather than real monitoring of executives and providing strategic advice on behalf of shareholders". The issue of gender representation on corporate boards of directors has been the subject of much criticism in recent years.
Governments and corporations have responded with measures such as legislation mandating gender quotas and comply or explain systems to address the disproportionality of gender representation on corporate boards. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For other uses, see Board Room disambiguation and Board of Trustees disambiguation. Management accounting Financial accounting Financial audit. Cooperative Corporation Limited liability company Partnership Sole proprietorship State-owned enterprise.
The National Bureau of Asian Research
Annual general meeting Board of directors Supervisory board Advisory board Audit committee. Commercial law Constitutional documents Contract Corporate crime Corporate liability Insolvency law International trade law Mergers and acquisitions. Commodity Public economics Labour economics Development economics International economics Mixed economy Planned economy Econometrics Environmental economics Open economy Market economy Knowledge economy Microeconomics Macroeconomics Economic development Economic statistics.
Marketing Marketing research Public relations Sales. Business analysis Business ethics Business plan Business judgment rule Consumer behaviour Business operations International business Business model International trade Business process Business statistics. The examples and perspective in this section deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject.
You may improve this article , discuss the issue on the talk page , or create a new article , as appropriate. May Learn how and when to remove this template message. The examples and perspective in this section deal primarily with the United Kingdom and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. April Learn how and when to remove this template message.
Directors' duties and Fiduciary duties. Alternate director Celebrity board director Chairman Chief executive officer Corporate governance Corporate title Gender representation on corporate boards of directors Interlocking directorate Governing boards of colleges and universities in the United States Managing director Non-executive director Parliamentary procedure in the corporate world President corporate title Supervisory board in German: A private company cannot use a written resolution under section A — a meeting must be held.
Company A owned a cinema, and the directors decided to acquire two other cinemas with a view to selling the entire undertaking as a going concern. They formed a new company "Company B" to take the leases of the two new cinemas. Later, instead of selling the undertaking, they sold all of the shares in both companies and made a substantial profit.
The shareholders of Company A sued asking that directors and their friends to disgorge the profits that they had made in connection with their 3, shares in Company B — the very same shares which the shareholders in Company A had been asked to subscribe through Company A but refused to do so. Institute on Governance Canada. Archived from the original on 30 December Retrieved 24 May The Robert's Rules Association.
- Family Secrets?
- JSTOR: Access Check.
- The Red Book of Guerrilla Warfare.
- Website design enquiry.
- Hung by the Tongue?
Archived from the original on 15 July Retrieved 24 December The Formative Years of the Modern Corporation: Retrieved 13 March CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of the governance rules Archived 11 June at the Wayback Machine.. The Journal of Finance. A Survey of Recent Evidence". Journal of Applied Finance. Corporate Governance by State". Nonprofit Governance by State". To Pay or Not to Pay?
Retrieved 2 May Author, Charities should generally not compensate persons for service on the board of directors except to reimburse direct expenses of such service. Charities may pay reasonable compensation for services provided by officers and staff. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Board of directors Corporate governance Executive compensation Senior management Supervisory board Talent management. Retrieved from " https: All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from November Articles with permanently dead external links Webarchive template wayback links Use dmy dates from March All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from February Articles with limited geographic scope from May USA-centric Vague or ambiguous geographic scope from November Articles with unsourced statements from July Interlanguage link template link number Articles with limited geographic scope from April United Kingdom-centric Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from April Articles with unsourced statements from April Views Read Edit View history.
This page was last edited on 13 September , at By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Management of a business. Accounting Management accounting Financial accounting Financial audit. Business entities Cooperative Corporation Limited liability company Partnership Sole proprietorship State-owned enterprise. Corporate governance Annual general meeting Board of directors Supervisory board Advisory board Audit committee.
Outside the USA, see our international sales information. University of Chicago Press: About Contact News Giving to the Press. Learning from Madness Kaira M. Stolen Time Shane Vogel. Paper Minds Jonathan Kramnick. Not-for-profit organizations play a critical role in the American economy. In health care, education, culture, and religion, we trust not-for-profit firms to serve the interests of their donors, customers, employees, and society at large. This book attempts to answer that question, assembling leading experts on the economics of the not-for-profit sector to examine the problems of the health care industry, art museums, universities, and even the medieval church.
Contributors look at a number of different aspects of not-for-profit operations, from the problems of fundraising, endowments, and governance to specific issues like hospital advertising. The picture that emerges is complex and surprising.