Responsible Transition: Securing U.S. Interests in Afghanistan Beyond 2011

Responsible Transition: Securing U.S. Interests in Afghanistan Beyond lays out a strategy for the post-July phase of the war, defines.
Table of contents

By the end of , we would reduce that presence by roughly half, consolidating our troops in Kabul and on Bagram Airfield.

Search form

One year later, by the end of , we will draw down to a normal embassy presence in Kabul, with a security assistance component, as we have done in Iraq. Last June, the Afghans reached that milestone as the ANSF assumed the lead for security across the whole of Afghanistan and our coalition forces shifted their focus to the training, advising, and assisting of Afghan forces. Today, Afghan forces provide security for their people and plan and lead the fight against the insurgency. The most recent example of this transition was the effective security provided by the ANSF to enable the April presidential and provincial elections.

Afghanistan - U.S. Relations

The ANSF will maintain its current surge strength of , to reinforce this progress and provide for a secure environment in Afghanistan. In May , the President signed a Strategic Partnership Agreement between the United States and Afghanistan that defined a future in which Afghans are responsible for the security of their nation.


  1. Hot Tamara;
  2. You are here.
  3. The Awakening and Selected Stories (The Penguin American Library).

The two countries pledged to build an equal partnership between two sovereign states premised on mutual respect and shared interests. The Strategic Partnership Agreement includes mutual commitments in the areas of: The United States continues to support a sovereign, stable, unified, and democratic Afghanistan and will continue our partnership based on the principles of mutual respect and mutual accountability.

We remain fully supportive of our partners in the Afghan security forces, and we continue to proudly work side-by-side with the many Afghans who work to ensure the stability and prosperity of their fellow citizens. This commitment is a clear message to the Afghan people that they will not stand alone as they take responsibility for their security.

At the Tokyo Conference, Afghanistan and the international community also committed to support the sustainable growth and development of Afghanistan. As the Afghans took control for their security, they also worked to usher in a historic transfer of power in Afghanistan. We congratulate the millions of Afghans who voted in the presidential elections in April, and we look forward to the inauguration of their next president later this summer.

The United States affirms its support for a fair, credible, and Afghan-led election process and does not support any candidate in the elections -- the choice of who leads Afghanistan is for Afghans alone. The United States also believes that an Afghan-led peace and reconciliation process is the surest way to end violence and ensure lasting stability for Afghanistan and the region.

As the President has said, the United States will support initiatives that bring Afghans together with other Afghans to discuss the future of their country. The United States and the Afghan government have called upon on the Taliban to join a political process.

Fact Sheet: Bringing the U.S. War in Afghanistan to a Responsible End

We believe that a stable and prosperous Afghanistan can only be possible in a stable and prosperous region. After this initial reduction, U. By , this transition process will be complete, and Afghanistan will be responsible for its own security. A Strategic Partnership Declaration between the United States and Afghanistan will solidify the long-term partnership. Rapid progress on this agenda is important and requires international support.

Toward this end, the U. In April Afghanistan and the United States finalized a strategic partnership agreement outlining their relationship following the withdrawal of Western combat troops from the country.

New CNAS Report Offers Strategy for Securing U.S. Interests in Afghanistan Beyond 2011

The deal insures American military and financial support for the Afghan people for at least a decade beyond , the deadline for most foreign combat forces to withdraw. Beyond , the United States shall seek funds, on a yearly basis, to support the training,equipping, advising, and sustaining of the Afghan National Security Forces ANSF , so that Afghanistan can independently secure and defend itself against internal and external threats, and help ensure that terrorists never again encroach on Afghan soil and threaten Afghanistan,the region, and the world.

Afghanistan will provide US forces continued access to and use of Afghan facilities through , and beyond as may be agreed in the Bilateral Security Agreement, for the purposes of combating al-Qaeda and its affiliates, training the Afghan National Security Forces, and other mutually determined missions to advance shared security interests. While much of that is already expedited through the international security force here, Secretary Clinton says the designation is a "powerful symbol" of the U.


  • NATO - Topic: NATO and Afghanistan?
  • Real World Camera Raw with Adobe Photoshop CS5!
  • Fact Sheet: Bringing the U.S. War in Afghanistan to a Responsible End | leondumoulin.nl.
  • Organization.
  • The Color of Night;
  • Responsible Transition: Securing U.S. Interests in Afghanistan Beyond 2011!

    • Washington needed the so-called bilateral security agreement BSA to be in place. A traditional national assembly of Afghan elders and politicians also endorsed the security pact 24 November But President Hamid Karzai since refused to sign the deal until the US military ends raids against Afghan homes while chasing insurgents and helps Kabul in opening peace talks with the Taliban.

    Karzai said the winner of that country's presidential election in April should sign the agreement. In an article published 28 January by The Washington Post, unnamed senior Afghan officials said Afghan President Karzai has a list of "dozens of attacks" he believes the U. S government may have been involved in an attempt to weaken him and foment instability in the country.