Read PDF Hippocrates Is Not Dead: An Anthology of Hippocratic Readings

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Hippocrates Is Not Dead: An Anthology of Hippocratic Readings file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Hippocrates Is Not Dead: An Anthology of Hippocratic Readings book. Happy reading Hippocrates Is Not Dead: An Anthology of Hippocratic Readings Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Hippocrates Is Not Dead: An Anthology of Hippocratic Readings at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Hippocrates Is Not Dead: An Anthology of Hippocratic Readings Pocket Guide.
Buy Hippocrates Is Not Dead: An Anthology of Hippocratic Readings: Read 1 Kindle Store Reviews - leondumoulin.nl
Table of contents

Thus, the presence of information on abortions in the Corpus Hippocratum does not in and of itself contradict the Oath. So what has happened is that they dont know what the words were because they were destroyed. The reason this is relevant is that this is the same word which is translated in the Hippocratic oath as abortion. So it may as well be translated as no seducing patients ie. So in this context f'thoreon can also mean wear like a pair of jeans or a virgin on her prima nocta.

Hey, The page isn't for writing the hippocratic oath. The hippocrat oath already exist doctors aren't checking wikipedia for what the hippocratic oath says. So if a version of the oath says something, then it says it. The oath isn't the writers biass or antones politics. Everything isn't politics, and the oath is one of those things —Preceding unsigned comment added by It says "the oath is considered a rite of passage for practitioners of medicine, although nowadays the modernized version of the text varies among the countries.

This entire section excepting point 3 is highly biased and has no citations for how these portions of the oath are challenged nor by whom they have been challenged. Without these it is simply commentary, I suggest either removing it altogether or finding at least one article alleging modern concerns to these points of the Oath. I'd also like to draw attention to point 7. To keep the good of the patient as the highest priority.

First this is not even a reference to any portion of any version of the Oath, nor does it refer to any text in the article whatsoever. Whereas, this point does appear to challenge the entire purpose behind the Hippocratic Oath, namely to have the welfare of the patient at the forefront of a doctor's surgeon, physician, specialist, etc.

All of the descriptions specifying the nature of this challenge refer more to political positions rather than a question of ethics - in particular the statement refers to "conserving economic resources, Salamandre85 talk , 17 November UTC. It is widely believed to have been written by Hippocrates, Rather, very few people believe it has been written by Hippocrates.

Aljunied talk , 9 June UTC. This is a programme that discusses a topic with invited experts on the subject each week. At 18 minutes and 3 seconds into the podcast Melvyn says that he gets the impression from the papers written by the experts that there is possibility the Hippocratic Oath "might well be tracked back to Hippocrates himself". He is immediately contradicted by one of the experts who says "No, I think we are agreeing on that one" - meaning all the experts agree that it is not a possibility it can be tracked back to Hippocrates himself.

If scholars don't believe it can be attributed to Hippocrates himself then it seems misleading to start the article saying it is widely believed to have been written by him unless by widely believed it is meant that most of the general public believe this. More importantly the reference used to justify this sentence in the wikipedia article also says he may not have written it This quote give me the impression he probably didn't write it, which contradicts the first sentence of the article. If Melvyn is unclear on the issue then its understandable that the writer of the article could be too, so I am just adding this comment to add more information to the debate I don't claim to have any other knowledge of Hippocrates.

Download options

Keep up the good work! The text of the Oath is not a "quote," in the sense of previously-published information about the article's subject. The text of the Oath IS the article's subject. The article on the British anthem, "God Save the Queen," includes the full lyric of the song. The article on Lincoln's Gettysburg Address includes the full text of the speech. I found that the information added to the page was very helpful, especially to the section the original oath broken down. The information seemed very relevant and crucial to understanding what the hippocratic oath is.

Also, I do like the other section about lethal injection that was added. It provided a good example of restrictions and problems faced with this oath during this time. It was very intriguing to read about this and learn that doctors did not administer the injections.

One thing I see that needs a change is when you stated all the parts of the oath out, maybe try making them more into a bulleted outline or along those lines.


  1. Navigation menu?
  2. Full text of "Hippocrates"?
  3. Find a copy online!
  4. Help Of Illusions - Boys In My Nightmares;
  5. Hippocrates, Volume I: Ancient Medicine (Loeb Classical Library, No. 147).
  6. Recent Comments;
  7. Romance: Riding the Alpha Cowboy: (BBW Alpha Male Billionaire Romance) (Western Contemporary Short Stories).

This gives more distinction to the parts of it and looks more organized. That way what you are explaining more in detail, shows that it is details and not another part of the oath. I did find that part a little confusing.

Similar books and articles

With the other section, I would try to find a little more about this story and length the section some to make it stronger in the information. Lastly, I think it would be nice to see a little more in the last section about breaking the oath, if possible. Overall though, the page is really well done. I'd be grateful for your insights, also for the case I'd like to insert more of this kind of links elsewhere.

Any thoughts? Although executions and abortion are referenced, this article is missing any discussion of physician-assisted suicide and related issues with regards to the Oath. Note 10 Dorman's article is supposed to substantiate statistical claims concerning the numbers of medical students swearing some form of the oath in the US and the UK. As far as I can tell, it does not discuss the use of the oath in the UK at all and it does not support the specific statistical claim concerning its use in the US.

Robert Hurd

I suspect the latter should be favored, but the former source is more recent if I'm correct that the latter is a republished Gifford Lecture. Moreover the very next sentence mentions the former source beginning with "alternatively. Kakurokuna talk , 20 March UTC. The truth really is the fragment of the Oath on the 3rd-century Papyrus Oxyrhynchus Responsible editors should ask American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons via email for any doubt.

The Oath was indeed written for who will fix broken bone too not who will perform abortion. Except the greek part and its translation nothing is too much relevant to Hippocrates. Keeping the sub-headers Contents, Text of the oath, Earliest surviving copy and link to "Modern version" should work fine as article and it may be locked. Modern version can be made a separate article with their non-orthopaedics opinion, criticism, relevance etc. Louis Lasagna may have importance to non-orthopaedics and WMA but not to the history of Orthopaedics.

I'm sure they have something to say but this claim is dubious and not really worth following up. Im going to mark this as resolved as your link is dead and you havnt provided any substantial evidence regarding the claims made and it's not consistent with any available research or any available copy of the greek text. I have just modified one external link on Hippocratic Oath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information.

I made the following changes:. When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. As of February , "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below.


  • Meaning of "dopeyness" in the English dictionary.
  • Xuxá 008 - A grande espiã!
  • Talk:Hippocratic Oath;
  • Description.
  • Robert Hurd | Catholic Theological Ethics in the World Church.

    • Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. Please stop editorializing this translation.

    The Hippocratic Oath – Darcie Vélez Psychic & Spiritual Healer, Witch

    Find another academic translation and source that if you do not agree with the translation, but do not editorialize. I previously posted this elsewhere in the talk section but due to the large amount of discussion over the translation of this particular word I am adding this under a new heading to link to the dubious tag I have added. I will explain the issue for you and give you textual references. In the study of ancient languages they reference item reference numbers and the collection to which it belongs. The standard practice involved tracing paper and rubbing a pencil over the inscription to make an impression.

    So we dont have the complete text. So they sort of guess the bits that are missing. So that page i linked has the pencil and squeeze copy of the inscription from years ago converted to text. I'll give a brief rough translation derived from a concordance of the available texts. I don't need to be a registered user to make edits on Wikipedia.

    What's controversial is you editorializing a source. Either quote the source fully or not at all, but do not edit sources. Stop editorializing. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hippocratic Oath article. There is no mention of smallpox or measles no certain reference occurs to diphtheria, scarlet fever, bubonic plague or syphilis.

    The question must be tvphoid. See Ejndemics IV. Eindemics VI. It X-qOapyo';, characterized by irresistible coma.