An agnostic is a person who believes that the existence of a greater power, such as a god, cannot be proven or disproved; therefore an agnostic wallows in the.
Table of contents
Go to the Religious Tolerance website to find information on different religious and spiritual beliefs. If you decide to become an agnostic, this website offers resources to help you learn more.
Navigation menu
Find a religion or group accepting of your spiritual beliefs. Some religions are accepting or of agnostic viewpoints. If you decide not to participate in organized religion, find a group of people with similar beliefs so you can socialize and find some support. This article was written by a professional writer, copy edited and fact checked through a multi-point auditing system, in efforts to ensure our readers only receive the best information.
To submit your questions or ideas, or to simply learn more, see our about us page: The database based on Word Net is a lexical database for the English Language. Bullivant, Stephen; Michael Ruse, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief.
From Epicurus to Sartre. Germani, Alan 15 September Archived from the original on An Intelligent Person's Guide to Atheism. Harris, Sam 2 October A History of American Secularism. Scientific and humanistic approaches". History of the Human Sciences. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments For and Against the Existence of God. The Range of Reason. Michael Martin; Ricki Monnier, eds. The Impossibility of God. The Improbability of God.
Some Dogmas of Religion New ed. The Atheist's Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life Without Illusions. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. A Short History of Western Atheism. A Guide for the Perplexed. Humanistic Metaphysical Methodological Religious. Atheists Agnostics Humanists Pantheists Deists. Retrieved from " https: Agnosticism Atheism Skepticism Irreligion Philosophy of religion. Articles needing additional references from February All articles needing additional references Articles lacking in-text citations from February All articles lacking in-text citations CS1 maint: Views Read Edit View history.
This page was last edited on 31 July , at So I took thought, and invented what I conceived to be the appropriate title of "agnostic". It came into my head as suggestively antithetic to the "gnostic" of Church history, who professed to know so much about the very things of which I was ignorant. To my great satisfaction the term took.
Therefore, although it be, as I believe, demonstrable that we have no real knowledge of the authorship, or of the date of composition of the Gospels, as they have come down to us, and that nothing better than more or less probable guesses can be arrived at on that subject. William Stewart Ross wrote under the name of Saladin. Ross championed agnosticism in opposition to the atheism of Charles Bradlaugh as an open-ended spiritual exploration.
In Why I am an Agnostic c. In , Russell gave a lecture on The existence and nature of God , in which he characterized himself as an atheist. The existence and nature of God is a subject of which I can discuss only half. If one arrives at a negative conclusion concerning the first part of the question, the second part of the question does not arise; and my position, as you may have gathered, is a negative one on this matter.
However, later in the same lecture, discussing modern non-anthropomorphic concepts of God, Russell states: That sort of God is, I think, not one that can actually be disproved, as I think the omnipotent and benevolent creator can. As a philosopher, if I were speaking to a purely philosophic audience I should say that I ought to describe myself as an Agnostic, because I do not think that there is a conclusive argument by which one can prove that there is not a God. On the other hand, if I am to convey the right impression to the ordinary man in the street I think I ought to say that I am an Atheist, because when I say that I cannot prove that there is not a God, I ought to add equally that I cannot prove that there are not the Homeric gods.
In his essay, What Is An Agnostic? An agnostic thinks it impossible to know the truth in matters such as God and the future life with which Christianity and other religions are concerned. Or, if not impossible, at least impossible at the present time. An atheist, like a Christian, holds that we can know whether or not there is a God. The Christian holds that we can know there is a God; the atheist, that we can know there is not. The Agnostic suspends judgment, saying that there are not sufficient grounds either for affirmation or for denial.
Later in the essay, Russell adds: I think that if I heard a voice from the sky predicting all that was going to happen to me during the next twenty-four hours, including events that would have seemed highly improbable, and if all these events then produced to happen, I might perhaps be convinced at least of the existence of some superhuman intelligence.
Although radical and unpalatable to conventional theologians, Weatherhead's agnosticism falls far short of Huxley's, and short even of weak agnosticism: Of course, the human soul will always have the power to reject God, for choice is essential to its nature, but I cannot believe that anyone will finally do this. Ingersoll , an Illinois lawyer and politician who evolved into a well-known and sought-after orator in 19th-century America, has been referred to as the "Great Agnostic". Is there a supernatural power—an arbitrary mind—an enthroned God—a supreme will that sways the tides and currents of the world—to which all causes bow?
I do not deny. I do not know—but I do not believe. I believe that the natural is supreme—that from the infinite chain no link can be lost or broken—that there is no supernatural power that can answer prayer—no power that worship can persuade or change—no power that cares for man. I believe that with infinite arms Nature embraces the all—that there is no interference—no chance—that behind every event are the necessary and countless causes, and that beyond every event will be and must be the necessary and countless effects.
- The Furniture Doctor: A Guide to the Care, Repair, and Refinishing of Furniture.
- Sustaining Global Surveillance and Response to Emerging Zoonotic Diseases.
- .
- .
Is there a God? I do not know.
- Seven Variationen, K25.
- Agnostic atheism - Wikipedia!
- .
- Agnostic atheism.
One thing I do know, and that is, that neither hope, nor fear, belief, nor denial, can change the fact. It is as it is, and it will be as it must be. In the conclusion of the speech he simply sums up the agnostic position as: We can be as honest as we are ignorant.
If we are, when asked what is beyond the horizon of the known, we must say that we do not know. In Ingersoll explained his comparative view of agnosticism and atheism as follows: The Agnostic is an Atheist. The Atheist is an Agnostic. Demographic research services normally do not differentiate between various types of non-religious respondents, so agnostics are often classified in the same category as atheists or other non-religious people. Agnosticism is criticized from a variety of standpoints. Some religious thinkers see agnosticism as limiting the mind's capacity to know reality to materialism.
How to Become an Agnostic
Some atheists criticize the use of the term agnosticism as functionally indistinguishable from atheism; this results in frequent criticisms of those who adopt the term as avoiding the atheist label. Theistic critics claim that agnosticism is impossible in practice, since a person can live only either as if God did not exist etsi deus non-daretur , or as if God did exist etsi deus daretur.
Religious scholars such as Laurence B. Brown criticize the misuse of the word agnosticism, claiming that it has become one of the most misapplied terms in metaphysics. Brown raises the question, "You claim that nothing can be known with certainty According to Pope Benedict XVI , strong agnosticism in particular contradicts itself in affirming the power of reason to know scientific truth.
The knowledge of God has always existed".
The Catholic Church sees merit in examining what it calls "partial agnosticism", specifically those systems that "do not aim at constructing a complete philosophy of the unknowable, but at excluding special kinds of truth, notably religious, from the domain of knowledge".
The Council of the Vatican declares, "God, the beginning and end of all, can, by the natural light of human reason, be known with certainty from the works of creation". Blaise Pascal argued that even if there were truly no evidence for God, agnostics should consider what is now known as Pascal's Wager: Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli cited 20 arguments for God's existence, [98] asserting that any demand for evidence testable in a laboratory is in effect asking God, the supreme being, to become man's servant.
According to Richard Dawkins , a distinction between agnosticism and atheism is unwieldy and depends on how close to zero a person is willing to rate the probability of existence for any given god-like entity.
Agnosticism - Wikipedia
About himself, Dawkins continues, "I am agnostic only to the extent that I am agnostic about fairies at the bottom of the garden. He states that "agnosticism about the existence of God belongs firmly in the temporary or TAP category. Either he exists or he doesn't. It is a scientific question; one day we may know the answer, and meanwhile we can say something pretty strong about the probability. Ignosticism is the view that a coherent definition of a deity must be put forward before the question of the existence of a deity can be meaningfully discussed.
If the chosen definition is not coherent, the ignostic holds the noncognitivist view that the existence of a deity is meaningless or empirically untestable. Ayer , Theodore Drange , and other philosophers see both atheism and agnosticism as incompatible with ignosticism on the grounds that atheism and agnosticism accept "a deity exists" as a meaningful proposition that can be argued for or against.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The view that certain metaphysical claims — such as the existence of God or the supernatural — are unknown and perhaps unknowable. Not to be confused with Gnosticism. Humanistic Metaphysical Methodological Religious. Philosophy portal Religion portal. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In the most general use of the term, agnosticism is the view that we do not know whether there is a God or not. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
In the popular sense, an agnostic is someone who neither believes nor disbelieves in God, whereas an atheist disbelieves in God. In the strict sense, however, agnosticism is the view that human reason is incapable of providing sufficient rational grounds to justify either the belief that God exists or the belief that God does not exist.
In so far as one holds that our beliefs are rational only if they are sufficiently supported by human reason, the person who accepts the philosophical position of agnosticism will hold that neither the belief that God exists nor the belief that God does not exist is rational. OED Online, 3rd ed. A person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of immaterial things, especially of the existence or nature of God.
Of or relating to the belief that the existence of anything beyond and behind material phenomena is unknown and as far as can be judged unknowable. The doctrine or tenets of agnostics with regard to the existence of anything beyond and behind material phenomena or to knowledge of a First Cause or God. The Fruits of the Contemplative Life". Archived from the original on February 9, If you ask me if there exists another world after death , I don't think so. I don't think in that way. I don't think otherwise. I don't think not.
I don't think not not. Archived from the original on February 2, Retrieved July 22, While the pious might wish to look to the gods to provide absolute moral guidance in the relativistic universe of the Sophistic Enlightenment, that certainty also was cast into doubt by philosophic and sophistic thinkers, who pointed out the absurdity and immorality of the conventional epic accounts of the gods.
Protagoras' prose treatise about the gods began "Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not or of what sort they may be. Many things prevent knowledge including the obscurity of the subject and the brevity of human life. Atheist Centre — Golden Jubilee. Archived from the original on June 29, Retrieved June 29,