The Cheating Game: The Signs and Reasons People Cheat and What to Do About It!

Gaming · Tech culture · Tech news · Video · Explainer videos 41 per cent of people said they cheated because they didn't feel particularly committed to their primary partner, ouch. These are the hidden signs your partner is cheating Yep, sometimes infidelity can be as simple as an act of pure rage.
Table of contents

Virgos are masters at cheating. They can keep the cheating going on pretty much for the rest of their lives without their partners ever finding out. They pre-plan everything by imagining every possible scenario of them getting caught. They are very efficient liars which also makes it easy for them to catch a liar. If a Virgo is cheating on you, there is no way in hell you will find out about it unless he or she tells you.

So, while dating a Virgo, be careful and be very cautious whenever their habits start to change. Chances are that you will never be able to detect any changes because they are such good liars but keeping an open mind does no harm. Virgos can love you and three other people at the same time without ever letting you feel ignored. Although not many Virgos take up the trouble to love more than one person due to their serious attitude in life, it is possible just as much.

Here are 13 things that you should know about loving a Virgo. Libras have mastered the art of deception. They can date two or more people for an indefinite amount of time without anything getting suspicious. They keep multiple backups even if they do get caught. The aforementioned traits make them dangerous cheaters. Their philosophy of life is pretty straight; everything happens for a reason and one has got to what he has got to do. Also read Why are Libras considered as the best long term partners.


  • Blender 2.5 HOTSHOT;
  • The Psychology of Cheating: Why do People Cheat in Multiplayer Games? | Mind The Ethos.
  • Infidelity Signs: How to Tell You've Got a Cheating Spouse | Reader's Digest!
  • Learning in Contemporary Culture (Perspectives in Education Studies Series);
  • ?
  • Wage-Earning Women: Industrial Work and Family Life in the United States, 1900-1930 (Galaxy Books).

Scorpio cannot really cheat on their partners because they take relationships very seriously. However, people can cheat on their partners with Scorpio because they fall in love very easily and are blinded by it. Due to this reason, they can never be the cheaters but can be the victims of cheating and being used. Once in, they only get out when they are forced to.

Scorpios cheat rarely and when they do, they do feel bad about it. Being easy to fall in love themselves, they know how it feels to lose a loved one and understand the pain, which is also why they refrain from cheating. They are also honest about cheating when they do cheat.

For Sagittarius, cheating is a game and they love to play it. They jump from one opportunity to the next and, in most cases, they always have a few dates lined up already. In fact, that is the only time they have fun with their lives. Sagittarius people are hard-working and in order to blow off steam, they date and cheat. They are the ultimate playboys.

They feel everything very intensely except for love; tension and stress gets to them which they cure by changing partners frequently. They know that it is not the right lifestyle and try to settle but they just cannot help it when it goes wrong. Sagittarius cheaters are capable of feeling regret. By Relationship Rules Last updated Aug 16, Welcome, Login to your account. The way he puts it is that everyone cheats some of the time, but very few people cheat all of the time.

The issue is that, in absolute terms, the damage done cumulatively by all the small cheaters adds up to much more than that of the small number of big cheaters. People all have a small bit of cheating leeway that they can do and not feel bad about themselves. Sometimes however, this leads down a slippery slope. Someone tries a small form of cheating, gets away with it and slowly but surely their dishonesty ratchets up to the point where it becomes a real problem with serious consequences.

Although the total length of the journey to being a big cheater may be long, the hops in between are very small. Once you have reached a certain level of dishonesty, your baseline also shifts. Once you are comfortable with where you are, you can just fudge along again. It starts off with them just trying out a cheat for fun or because they are bored.

Getting banned for cheating, if you get caught at all, usually runs up a slope of escalation. You might get a warning, a temporary ban and eventually a permanent ban that can be defeated by buying another copy. How far people are willing to go also depends on the perceived risk of cheating and how badly they want the feeling that cheating can give them. For example, if both the stakes and the risk is low you should see more cheating.

They come home later

If they both are high, it would depend on how high the perceived reward was relative to the risk. For the potential cheater, the juice must be worth the squeeze. Game developers are getting wise to some of the psychology behind cheaters of late. They have realized that there have to be severe consequences and that they have to happen fast. Blizzard has actually been doing a very effective job with Overwatch. A permanent ban in Overwatch is really, really permanent.

You don't find them, you choose them. And when you do, you're on the path to fulfillment. Verified by Psychology Today. An overwhelming majority of adults, in North America and Europe, believe that infidelity is wrong Blow and Hartnett, But despite this widespread social censure, infidelity is fairly common. Not unsurprisingly, motivations for cheating vary, as does the nature of the illicit union—one-night stands or long-term affairs, purely sexual liaisons or strong emotional connections Blow and Hartnett, However, men and women are equally likely to cite emotional or sexual motivations if their primary relationship is lacking in either regard Omarzu et al.

Couples tend to match each other on many characteristics, including education , income, physical attractiveness, religious views, interests, and attitudes. Those couples who do not match on one or more important trait may be more vulnerable to infidelity, perhaps because they experience higher levels of marital dissatisfaction.

For example, couples with the same religion and educational level are less likely to experience infidelity, and couples in which both partners have a college degree enjoy especially low rates of infidelity Brooks and Monaco, Interestingly, women with higher levels of education than their spouses may be more likely to cheat than comparable women with equally-educated spouses Forste and Tanfer, This is consistent with the argument that spouses with greater socioeconomic resources will be less afraid of jeopardizing their primary relationship through infidelity Forste and Tanfer, Similarly, individuals may be more likely to cheat when they are employed but their spouse is not: This effect appears to be stronger for sole-breadwinner women than for sole-breadwinner men Brooks and Monaco, ; Atkins et al.

Shared employment status might reflect spousal similarity, and the shared experience of employment might strengthen couple bonds. Given the popular stereotype that female infidelity is far rarer than male infidelity, the findings that motivations for cheating are similar for women and men may be surprising. But there may be less of a gender gap in cheating than is commonly supposed.

Historically, men have generally reported higher rates of infidelity, but the gender gap appears to be diminishing as women gain socioeconomic and sexual autonomy. For example, using data from the General Social Survey, multiple independent studies find a large gender gap in reported infidelity among older cohorts but a small or non-existent gap among middle-aged and younger adults Atkins et al. This absence of a gender difference in reported infidelity is reflected in other recent studies of college students Brand et al.

Moreover, even when a gender gap in reported infidelity is evident, it might result at least in part from gendered reporting bias. Fisher and Brunell find that the gender gap in reported romantic cheating disappears when undergraduates believe they are being monitored by a lie detector. The authors suggest that much of the apparent gender gap in infidelity in survey data may reflect a gender difference in reporting rather than a gender difference in actual behavior. Most obviously, discovering infidelity is often very painful to the deceived spouse Blow and Hartnett, and infidelity is very damaging to the primary relationship, often resulting in divorce DeMaris, But these costs may not be effective deterrents.

For both genders, dissatisfaction with the current relationship is often a central motivation for infidelity—and so hurting the spouse or damaging the marriage just may not matter to dissatisfied spouses. Given these weak disincentives for infidelity, cheating is likely to continue, despite social disapproval. Websites such as AshleyMadison. Perhaps we should be less surprised that infidelity is common despite social disapprobation, and instead be grateful that most of our partners don't cheat.

Follow me on Twitter! ElizaMSociology I post about new blog postings for PT, new publications, upcoming presentations, and media coverage of my research. About one tweet every weeks. I once knew a "gadfly type" who was as fat as a house. He said, "Why should I care if my wife cheats on me as long as she's avaible when I want her? Hey guys, My ex fiance was cheating on me but I had no proof and I felt crazy and paranoid at that time, I even felt I was losing my mind.

I needed closure badly and I hired a hacker and although I had mixed feelings when I found out I wasn't loosing my mind but it s what it is. Within a marriage we all eventually experience hurt, disappointment, rejection, neglect, doubt and the list goes on.

Understanding the reasons behind infidelity can help you avoid its damage.

It happens to us all, even to those within good and healthy marriages. Sometimes we develop the skills to work through those issues, sometimes we do not. But only some cheat, others do not. Well, Cheating has nothing to do with the quality of a marriage or unmeet needs. That is what cheaters want their partners to believe. Cheaters cheat because of a sense of entitlement. I have yet to meet one cheater who would be willing to forgive their partners if they suddenly found themselves cheated on. And this way of thinking is part of their personality. Cheaters cheat not because of what happens within their marriage but because of their world view.

Is there any cheater out there who honestly believes they did something wrong? They may regret the pain they caused, but not the act itself because in their minds they have a right to cheat. But to say that anything else is BS, is just more BS. It is not sometimes true, it is mostly always true. And you know it. You are too smart to fall for the whole "unmet needs" nonsense. The mentality of a cheater is similar to the mentality of the perpetrator of domestic violence.

Of course there are nuances. But we cannot moraly say that when a man beats up a woman the approach should be,"its complicated, its a relationship issue, lets see how the behavior of both contributes to his violent outburst. Yes, maybe she is an obnoxious bitch, but that does not excuse domestic violence.

Well, cheating is a form of abuse by the pain an emotional damage it causes, just like domestic violence. So yes, just like domestic abuse cheating is about entitlment. Blame shifting is idiotic. You're walking right into your own trap here. Do you have the sophistication to understand the difference between excusing violence and trying to fix the problem by determining all the causes and the whole situation? Yes, in many cases a cheater feels entitled.

But also often someone is driven from their spouses by severe neglect, and that is not just one-in-a-million, as you seem to fancifully theorize. And no, "unmet needs" are a reality. I suppose in your world, every spouse is always bending over backwards to provide everything? And no spouse neglects? How about your scenario where someone beats their spouse. I've heard of instances where the beaten spouse goes to another person for solace, to talk, and one thing leads to another.

I always liked your comments in other posts, so I know you are a smart guy, but you are not following closely here. Of course there unmet needs, I thought I wrote as much, but they are not an excuse. Just like being nasty to someone is not excuse for them to hit you. I feel like I am repeating myself. You are repeating yourself. Over and over again, you seem to not understand that I agree that a cause is NOT a justification. How many times do I have to agree with that?

Why don't you try following your own instructions for once, namely "following closely here"? So I'll repeat again, a cause is not the same as a justification. If a woman is emotionally neglected by her husband, and she ends up talking to another man who "understands her feelings" for the first time in 10 years, and she falls in love with him, the husband's neglect is NOT a justification for her actions, but it is a cause. You can't possibly be that obtuse.

I think you're perhaps in a bubble of information here for three reasons, in spite of the fact that there is often two sides to a story:. You assume that all cheaters are liars, so anything they say with regard to the reasons for their actions again, "reasons" not justifications, but reasons as in "causes", things that if they didn't exist, they might not have cheated. So because all cheaters are liars, you dismiss that part of any story.

And besides, they have a "world view" of entitlement. All betrayed people people who've been cheated on are all honest and have all bent over backwards to fulfill all needs in the marriage, and always tell the truth about why their spouse cheated on them.

And because, by mirror of what you've said about cheaters, the cheated-on people have a "word view" of being only victims who could not possibly take any responsibility for what happened. You automatically know of the vast majority of cheating cases, because they'd all tell you, including the ones that are never found out -- but they still come to you to tell you. I find it hilarious how the gender gap of cheating disappears when a lie detector is thought to be present. Not exceeding 6 years. Basically include variables without being so rigid. I wonder if the best predictor of infidelity is simply opportunity?

Perhaps attractive people cheat more than unattractive people. Perhaps people who travel a lot for work cheat more than those who are stuck home. Perhaps people who work in environments with a lot of the opposite sex cheat more. Maybe people with more money cheat more because they can afford hotel rooms or extra apartments. Do you see what I'm getting at? I would say maybe. The thing with affairs is that very few of them are a one time thing. Its not like a man goes on a trip, meets a woman, goes to a hotel room and then is over.

And you can see them caming a long way before it happens. Most of us hit the brakes before we get there, opportunity or not, but cheaters just keep going. Cheaters also intentionally create an environment where they have opportunities, but will do whatever it takes so that their partners don't have opportunities. Haven't you noticed that cheaters are usually very controling of their partners? They are very judgemental and quick to mistrust their partners. Sorry if I rant, but cheating hurts more than anything else you can experience. It kills you inside.

Actually, sometimes it is. Yes, you do rant, and you do have a narrow cookie-cutter one-dimensional view of an "archetypal" cheater. Perhaps you're really relating your own specific experience here? Everything you say seems to describe, in too much detail and particulars, what could happen in one particular case. It just doesn't cover the whole gamut, not even by a long shot. No, you are just being deliberately obtuse, and you know it. Of course that what I write does not apply to every single case.

There are exceptions, and sometimes affairs are a one time thing. But exceptions are called exceptions because they are exceptions. I apologize if my view of affairs do no encompass every single possible scenario that could exist, including the one in a million exceptions, my hands would wither from all the typing. But as far as most affairs are concerned I am correct on my characterization, I ask anyone who has been the victim of cheating to tell me I am wrong, that what I write about their betraying partners is somehow off the mark.

No, I do not think so. The only ones who would argue otherwise are cheaters themselves. So maybe I lack the sophistication to see through the all infinite nuances of betrayal. But I think you mistake obfuscation for nuance. So, anyone out there reading this who was the victim of an affair, am I correct on my assesment? I apologize if my view of affairs do no encompass every single possible scenario that could exist, including the one in a million exceptions.

Well, see, that's just the thing. They are not one-in-a-million exceptions. You appear to want to have your cake and eat it too. Uh huh, you're of course not claiming "every single case", but just one-in-a-million. Where do you get these statistics? Not to mention that what you're saying directly contradicts the article here. Well, see, now we get to "most" which is a bit different from , out of 1,, In many cases it does. Well, see, right there you reveal a huge flaw in your methodology. You're only talking about those instances of cheating that were found out, and then were willing to tell you about it.

Many instances of cheating are never found out. It's only on the Dr. Phil Show that cheaters are found out -- why else would they even be on the show? Phil has a professional staff of researchers digging into everything for weeks before the show. What you're missing is those you don't talk to, because for instance, they don't know they've been cheated on. Oh yeah, right, blah blah blah. Your psychological insight is underwhelming. Great way to pressure anybody in a conversation into fear of guilt for disagreeing with you.

Uhm, how can anybody who doesn't know they're being cheated on answer your question?

Why People Cheat | Psychology Today

So obviously you're only going to get a skewed example. And do you really people who've been cheated on will generally be honest about how they might have contributed to the problem? But you would, of course, say that the person who has cheated will always be dishonest, and the betrayed person will always be honest. And so that is your world view. And I suspect it's becaues YOU have been cheated on and so you will insist that that's the way the world is, period. And you've made a poor argument for it.

What you say is sometimes exactly true. And many times not true. Because if what you say is true, it means logically that no matter how much you mistreat your spouse, and no matter how much you emotionally neglect or sexually shut off your spouse, they will never cheat on you for those reasons.

And that is logicall absurd. And those are frequent situations. It doesn't justify cheating, but that's not your argument. You claim it's never for those reasons, justified or not. Your arguments are idiotic, and you are purposely spliting hairs. You know I am right but you just need to make the indefensible defensible, and that is your problem. Read carefully all my comments. Are there valid reasons to want to cheat on a partner?

Absolutely, but most of us either endure it or divorce. We do not hit our partners when they are rude or obnoxious to us an then say "well, lets look at it from both sides. She was mean to me so it is wrong for me to hit her but she was asking for it. If you view cheating as only a small transgression then I get your view. But I view it as a form of domestic abuse.

Research into gender, income, and other factors that drive infidelity.

Have you ever met anyone who was cheated on and said "no big deal, it doesn't hurt that much. So, knowing how it can hurt someone, yet still doing it, its like knowing how a fist can hurt but still desiding to hit someone. No, actually, my arguments are exactly on target. All I've said is that there is a wide variety of situations and reasons, and that is well-supported not only by the very article of this forum, but by many other sources -- books, or even the Dr.

Phil show I mentioned. I don't like the show much, but at least I've seen several shows where the REASON why the person cheated was profound neglect within the marriage. Again, you confuse justification for reason.

12 Subtle Signs You’ve Got a Cheating Spouse

Are you really that "obtuse"? The fact that there is a contributing cause for someone cheating -- such as a woman being emotionally neglected by her husband for 10 years -- does not mean she was in the "right" and "justified". Or are you having trouble understanding the difference between the basic concepts of "cause" and "justification"? Yes, cheating can hurt many people very badly, and that is completely consistent with everything I've said. So I'll repeat again since you seem to have trouble understanding it -- a cause is not justification.

I'll repeat again, a cause is not justification. Or do you need it repeated again with other wordings? I think you mean excuse not reason. There's never a "reason" you have to cheat on your spouse. But I will grant you that some people have better excuses than others and it infidelity doesn't rise to the same level of egregiousness in every relationship. But everyone has the ability to leave a marriage. Those who choose to stay and cheat may have a good "excuse" but it's a stretch to call it a "reason". It's always a justification, not an actual reason. If you need sex and companionship and you want it from someone besides your spouse, then you would have a reason to leave your marriage.

If you want to do it within your marriage for whatever justification you can come up with then you're just making an excuse for why you believe you're entitled to cheat but don't want to have to go through either a divorce or the hassle of speaking to your spouse about honestly opening up your marriage. Nope, I meant contributing cause, not "excuse" or "justification" to assuage guilt or blame the spouse. Right, you're repeating yourself. There's no "reason" as in "justification".

But there are contributing causes. To suggest otherwise, as I've said before, is logically the equivalent of saying that nothing would ever be a contributing cause, not even years of neglect, which is not uncommon. Phil say, "Here's how you can reduce the chances of your spouse cheating on you? Because, according to you, no matter how badly you treat your spouse, their chances of cheating remain the same -- they will only cheat if they have a "world view" of your description.