Get e-book VX (Jihad Fire Book 2)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online VX (Jihad Fire Book 2) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with VX (Jihad Fire Book 2) book. Happy reading VX (Jihad Fire Book 2) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF VX (Jihad Fire Book 2) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF VX (Jihad Fire Book 2) Pocket Guide.
If you buy a new print edition of this book (or purchased one in the past), you can buy the Kindle edition for only $ (Save 70%). Print edition purchase must.
Table of contents

• The Man Behind Bin Laden | The New Yorker
• BOOKS BY THOMAS HOOVER
• The Dependent Elderly
• See a Problem?

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has warned that Israel will not cooperate with the Palestinian Authority during elections if candidates from Hamas are allowed to participate. Jones II said the U. Israel 's disengagement from the Gaza Strip and northern West Bank was applauded by the international community as an important and painful step toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

In an effort to bolster their standing with the Palestinian public, groups such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad claim it was their terror campaign that forced Israel to withdraw. Israel was not driven from the territories, it made a calculated decision to leave based on its own interests. The 8, civilians who lived in Gaza were viewed by the terrorists as targets, and Israel had to devote a great deal of its human and material resources to protect these innocent people.

In addition, Sharon agreed with those who concluded it would make no sense for Israel to hold on to an area with a Palestinian population exceeding one million. By withdrawing, Israel's security has been enhanced, and the Palestinians have been given the opportunity to govern themselves and demonstrate whether they are able and willing to create a democratic society that can coexist with Israel. At the time of the disengagement, Israel had dramatically reduced the level of terror, and the security fence around Gaza had a nearly perfect record of preventing the infiltration of suicide bombers.

Israeli forces had severely damaged the terrorist infrastructure and killed or jailed most of the leaders of the major terror groups. The disengagement took place after Israel won the Palestinian War the Palestinian Authority had instigated in , and the withdrawal took place from a position of strength, not weakness.

Palestinian extremists can claim whatever they want, but even they know the truth. We achieved nothing in 50 years of struggle; we've achieved only our survival. If Israel didn't want to leave Gaza, no one could have forced them out. Those who claim the rockets and attacks made them leave are kidding themselves. Israel is a democracy and believes in free elections as the best means of insuring representative government.

Consequently, Israel has been supportive of the idea of democratic elections in the Palestinian Authority. In the presidential election , international observers reported that Israel made no effort to impede the vote. To the contrary, it took a number of measures to facilitate the election. Similarly, Israel has no intention of interfering in the upcoming legislative elections in the PA.

While there is some dispute about whether and how Palestinians living in Jerusalem may participate, a similar issue was resolved before the last election. The Jerusalem issue, however, is being used as a smokescreen by the Palestinians to obscure their internal divisions. Palestinian officials have been talking for months about delaying the elections scheduled for January 25 because of chaos and disorder throughout the PA, and because of fears that they will lose power and that Hamas will take seats from the dominant Fatah party. Many Palestinians also legitimately fear the election will not be fair.

With just three weeks to go before the election, the Palestinian election commission resigned because the commissioners said Prime Minister Ahmed Korei was interfering with their work.

After the last election, 46 officials from the PA Central Election Committee resigned to protest voting irregularities and fraud. So long as the PA is unable to insure the safety of its residents, it will be unable to hold a free democratic election.

Many faculty, however, do not resist temptation; rather, they embrace their position as an ideological platform. Those who abuse their rights, and insist they can say what they want, hypocritically denounce others who exercise their right to criticize them. Legality is not the issue in evaluating the anti-Israel, sometimes anti-Semitic speeches and teachings of faculty and speakers on campus. No one questions that freedom of speech allows individuals to express their views.

For the last several years, for example, an anti-Semitic forum has been held at different universities by the Palestine Solidarity Movement PSM. In , the conference was held at Duke University. It is sometimes suggested critics seek to stifle legitimate criticism of Israel.

A related question is whether the presentations are in any way academic or scholarly. Few people would claim that a conference in which anti-black, anti-gay, or anti-woman sentiments were expressed would be protected by academic freedom, and yet that is the shield used to permit attacks on the Jewish people. We cannot give up a single inch of it. Therefore, we will not recognize the Israeli enemy's [right] to a single inch. Nevertheless, so long as the Palestinian people continue to be denied by their leaders the freedoms of speech, religion, assembly and the press, the election cannot be considered truly free and democratic.

While democratic outcomes are preferable to the alternatives, the rest of the world is not obligated to have a relationship with elected leaders whose policies and views are dangerous. Adolf Hitler was elected by the German people, but few people would suggest today that the rest of the world should have ignored his genocidal views and treated him as an equal just because he emerged from a democratic process.

Similarly, the current Iranian president was elected and is still widely viewed as a pariah because of his threats to destroy Israel and to pursue nuclear weapons in defiance of the rest of the world. The Palestinian people chose to elect members of an organization whose avowed purpose is the destruction of Israel by violent means.

Hamas is recognized throughout the world as a terrorist organization. Since the election, Hamas leaders have reaffirmed their commitment to the Hamas covenant calling for the liberation of all of Palestine and they have made clear it they have no intention of disarming. Israel now has on its borders a quasi government run by people who oppose negotiations and compromise.

See a Problem?

Hamas can now take over all of the security services and weapons that have previously been given by Israel and others to the Palestinian Authority to keep the peace. The institutions that were bound by agreements to stop the violence, confiscate illegal weapons, end smuggling and cease incitement are now controlled by the very people most responsible for terror, gun running, and the use of the media and schools to demonize Israel and Jews. Most of the world understands that Hamas is not a partner for peace and that it is a terrorist group that threatens the stability of the region.

The United States and other countries rightly have said that it must recognize Israel and renounce terror before any diplomatic or economic support can be given to the PA.

Of course, we went through a similar exercise in when similar demands were made of the PLO. Yasser Arafat made the necessary commitments in a letter to then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin , but he never matched the words with deeds. The world will be wise not to make the same mistake with Hamas. For too long, the international community has failed to extract a price for the Palestinian recourse to terror. That failure has not brought peace, but far worse it has produced the "Palestine" we have now: destitute, savage against both Israelis and moderate Arabs, and, so far, incapable of managing its internal affairs peacefully and competently.

By refusing to render Hamas respectable, the U. They're educating them. The Palestinians and other Muslims routinely accuse Israel of threatening their holy places in Jerusalem and have discovered that this is a good way to provoke local violence and international condemnation. The tactic goes back to the s when the Mufti of Jerusalem made similar charges that provoked widespread rioting.

The latest example of using this method of incitement which violates the road map and Oslo agreements came when Sheikh Mohammad Hussein, the director of the al-Aqsa Foundation, accused Israel of excavating under the Temple Mount with the intention of destroying the al-Aqsa mosque. As in the past, the charge is a total fabrication. The most recent construction involved the development of a new visitors center built around new findings excavated near the Western Wall. Discoveries at the new site include a ritual bath from the period of the second Jewish Temple , destroyed in 70 C.

It is not underneath the Temple Mount and nowhere near the al-Aqsa mosque. Israel denied the accusations, but official government denials rarely satisfy those who are ready to believe any libel emanating from the Palestinian Authority. In this case, however, UPI reporter Joshua Brilliant attended the Foundation press conference during which a misleading film was shown purporting to prove the charges. Brilliant independently investigated the tunnel and found no evidence of any excavation in the direction of the mosque.

Sometimes the myths propagated by Arabs and Muslims are so outrageous and ridiculous that it would seem to be a waste of time to respond. This is one of those instances. Unfortunately, history has proven that one cannot underestimate the capacity of people to believe even the most absurd charges when they are applied to Israel. They were solicited by a Danish publication, Jyllands-Posten , and have subsequently been reprinted widely. In fact, one blogger posted images from an Egyptian newspaper that published the cartoons.

In a juvenile and bizarre effort to retaliate for what they consider an affront to Islam, Iran is now soliciting cartoons lampooning the Holocaust. This really is nothing new as Iran and other Muslim nations routinely publish vile anti-Semitic cartoons in their state-controlled media. Sensitivity and tolerance are a one-way street in those countries.