U.S. Marine Corps Strategy

HTML. v.s. Marine Corps Service strategy United States Marine Corps. General Robert B. Neller. 37th Commandant of the Marine Corps.
Table of contents

Also available via the Internet. Library of Congress Online Catalog , More about Copyright and other Restrictions For guidance about compiling full citations consult Citing Primary Sources. Cite This Item Citations are generated automatically from bibliographic data as a convenience, and may not be complete or accurate.

The author outlines eight principles for a risk management defense strategy. He argues that these principles provide Includes bibliographical references p. This will not only change the nature of warfare, but also alter Strategic Studies Institute Date: Also available via the internet from the GPO Access web site. Keep and use what we have. Our existing naval expeditionary forces are designed for the sequential employment and accelerated projection of combat power ashore.

With a diminishing Defense budget, the Marine Corps and Navy are now forced to review structure needed to meet global commitments. Eventually this will lead to some dramatic changes and requires looking at force structure in different ways. A smaller Marine Corps means a great deal of flexibility will be lost. The loss of flexibility that has enabled the Navy-Marine Corps team to:. This may have been a busy couple of days but an impressive battle-rhythm by any standard for the Navy-Marine Corps team.

Unwittingly, this determination has given rise to a scramble among the various Services to stay relevant as budget cuts are considered. This approach is not new for Samuel Huntington, who wrote Proceedings, May The fundamental element of a military service is its purpose or role in implementing national strategy. As the budget ax falls, cutting out the budget savings, there will be Service fights over roles and missions.

The world knows the U. Marine Corps is the best force-in-readiness the United States possesses, as it has clearly demonstrated time and time again. This clearly is not lost on the Defense Secretary Robert M. A Service is many things: But none of these have meaning or usefulness unless there is a unifying purpose which directs their relations and activities towards achievement of some goal of national policy.

Again, we see the questioning the need for a Marine Corps and with that comes the questioning of the need for naval expeditionary forces period. Do not overlook a major amphibious operation in the Gulf War — the demonstration or feint off Kuwait which tied down 7 Iraqi divisions while the Coalition forces invaded from the south.

About this Item

The first major attack into Afghanistan was an amphibious operation that landed Marines in Afghan from amphibious ships in the Indian Ocean. This amphibious was literally the can opener of Operation Enduring Freedom in southern Afghanistan. Many of its suggestions are overly detailed for contemporary audiences, soldier or scholar, or have been simply overtaken with time.

Likewise, its understanding of how small wars might evolve in the modern context misses, for obvious reasons, important developments of the past several decades. Sadly, these areas are where the bulk of its pages are spent. Meanwhile, its insights into timeless tactics like ambushes remain valid, but these are captured in many other military documents that are used in training solders today.

In this way the Manual has become more a historical document than anything else. In the end, the most relevant pages of the Small Wars Manual are found its first chapter. Here the nature of small wars is defined. Here are the central insights surrounding linked military action and diplomatic activity during small wars. Here are the beginnings of the need to understand the local culture and support the security of the local people. Anything after that serves only to refine, highlight, or provide historical context.

These numbers take two forms, one stamped at the upper right or left corner of each page and a second consistently printed at the bottom of the page in the middle.

Defining the Marine Corps’ Strategic Concept

These numbers often do not match since the stamps refer to subsections and not pages themselves. For the sake of consistency, this paper cites pages using the bottom number listed on each page. Because these reset with each new chapter, citations list both the chapter and the page, where the first number in the citation before the hyphen is the chapter and the second number is the page, e. GPO, , Westview Press, , 1. An Old Solution to a New Challenge? Basic Books, , That this is the conclusion of a document resting its authority on decades of counterinsurgency experiences gives the message a practical strength that augments the readily apparent moral condemnation of torture.


  1. A State of Emergency?
  2. Bid High.
  3. Vaulted Eagles;
  4. Just A Word....
  5. .
  6. Modern Theoretical and Observational Cosmology: Proceedings of the 2nd Hellenic Cosmology Meeting, h!

Indeed, his work is the best for understanding the context and the authors that helped give rise to the Manual. The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power.

2017 US Marine Corps Recruit Training - MCRD Parris Island Boot Camp

By reviewing instances of American involvement in small wars from throughout the 19 th and 20 th centuries, Boot highlights just how long the United States has been fighting and learning from these wars. He devotes an entire chapter to the Small Wars Manual that is especially useful in putting it into context.

Their Principles and Practice. A bit dated at points, it remains a classic for understanding the development of small war or counterinsurgency thinking. Indeed, many of the key concepts and terms used by later writers are rooted in those coined by Caldwell.

leondumoulin.nl: U.S. Marine Corps Strategy (MCDP ) (): U. S. Marine Corps: Books

The Small Wars Manual captures many of the timeless strategic and tactical aspects of fighting insurgencies and remains especially valuable today as a historical document capturing how the U. This may be the seminal work on counterinsurgency published in the 20 th century, and Galula is a required reading for both scholars and practitioners alike.

Born of his experiences in fighting insurgencies in Asia and North Africa, this book captures many of the most widely accepted tenants of counterinsurgency in just one hundred pages. The New Press, Perhaps the leading proponent of an alternative view toward counterinsurgency practices, Col. Gian Gentile suggests much that we take as given about population centric counterinsurgency operations is often irrelevant and may be problematic for attaining American policy objectives. Oxford University Press, In it, he argues that that what might be considered modern small wars cannot be addressed using counterterrorism and counterinsurgency strategies of the past, but need new strategies that address singular aspects of these fights.

His nuanced analysis of the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan are especially thought provoking. Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife: University of Chicago Press, He explores how military organizations learn during counterinsurgency operations and alter their methods over time. Amos, Sarah Sewall, and David H. This is the latest work on counterinsurgency by the U. Because it is the latest manifestation of American military thinking on how to fight counterinsurgencies, it is required reading for any student seriously interested in the subject.

This short article written for the Marine Corps Historical Program provides an easily accessible history of the development and application of the Small Wars Manual. Posted by Roger Beckett on September 22, at Classics of Strategy and Diplomacy. Subscribe to this blog's feed. Blog powered by Typepad. Bradley Potter, Johns Hopkins University SAIS The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan catapulted the topic counterinsurgency from conversations among a handful of military thinkers and scholars and into the daily evening news.

Even while making some concrete prescriptions based on past experiences for how to propagate these operations in the future, it warns: An Organization of its Era But what are the origins of this guidance?

Forces and Estimate of Situation Strategy is just the beginning of the intuitional learning demonstrated by the Small Wars Manual.