In The Limits of U.S. Military Capability, Lebovic shows how political and psychological factors trumped U.S. military superiority in Vietnam and Iraq, where .
Table of contents
- Catering Business Secrets: How to Start and Run Your Own Profitable Catering Business from Home.
- Hindi-English/English-Hindi Concise Dictionary (Hippocrene Concise Dictionary);
- The Beaded Medicine Wheel;
- Death of A Cunning Man.
- Embedded DSP Processor Design: Application Specific Instruction Set Processors (Systems on Silicon).
- Project MUSE - The Limits of U.S. Military Capability.
- ;
The two closest competitors, China and Russia, accounted for 11 percent and 5 percent respectively. Thus, last year, the United States spent more than three times as much as China and more than seven times as much as Russia on the military.
In this Book
In this context, the U. In the current Ukraine crisis, the Russian government does not seem at all impressed by the U. Also, the Chinese government, ignoring Washington's protests, has laid out ambitious territorial claims in the East and South China Seas. Even much smaller, weaker nations have been snubbing the advice of U. Israel has torpedoed U.
Of course, hawkish critics of the Obama administration say that it lacks influence in these cases because it is unwilling to use the U. But is this true? The Obama administration channeled very high levels of military manpower and financial resources into lengthy U. Furthermore, in previous decades, the U. The bloody Korean War, for example, left things much as they were before the conflict began, with the Korean peninsula divided and a ruthless dictatorship in place in the north.
International Security 24 4: United States Army in Vietnam.
- Scion: Book 1: House of Bardin!
- Deformation of Earth Materials: An Introduction to the Rheology of Solid Earth.
- Motorcycles in Vietnam.
- The Limits of Military Power | HuffPost.
- FUTURE TENSE.
- The Limits of U.S. Military Capability.
- Moody Forest.
- E-Book Enlightenment.
- Additional Information.
- Waiting On Humanity.
The Final Years, — The Limits of Air Power: The American Bombing of North Vietnam. Modern War in the Third World.
The Limits of U.S. Military Capability
International Security 10 4: The Battle for Basra. Institute for the Study of War. The Fragmentation of the Sadrist Movement. Rusk, and Arthur C. Continuity and Change in American Politics: Parties and Issues in the Election. American Political Science Review 63 4: Pivotal Deterrence and the Kosovo War: Why the Holbrooke Agreement Failed. Political Science Quarterly 4: Victory at Any Cost: Domergue, Jeremy and Marisa Cochrane, How Smart and Tough If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE, click 'Authenticate'.
View freely available titles: Book titles OR Journal titles. Buy This Book in Print. In The Limits of U. Military Capability, Lebovic shows how political and psychological factors trumped U. Lebovic contends that the United States is at a particular disadvantage when fighting a counterinsurgency without the full support of the host government; when leveraging various third parties the adversary's foreign allies, societal leaders, and indigenous populations ; when attempting to build coalitions and nations while involved in combat; and when sustaining government and public support at home when costs rise and benefits decline.
Lebovic cautions against involving the U.
The Limits of Military Power
Ambitious goals bring higher costs, unexpected results, diminished options, and a greater risk of failure. Rejecting the heavy-handed approach that is typical of most comparisons between the Vietnam and Iraq wars, The Limits of U. Military Capability carefully assesses evidence to develop lessons applicable to other conflicts—especially the ongoing war in Afghanistan.
The Wars in Vietnam and Iraq pp.