Who Decides, and How?: Preferences, Uncertainty, and Policy Choice in the European Parliament

How do individual legislators in the European Parliament (EP) make Preferences, Uncertainty, and Policy Choice in the European Parliament.
Table of contents

Explore products from global brands in clothing, electronics, toys, sports, books and more. Be the first to review this item Would you like to tell us about a lower price? Customer reviews There are no customer reviews yet.

Subscriber Login

Share your thoughts with other customers. Write a product review. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations. View or edit your browsing history. Get to Know Us.

Who Decides, and How?: Preferences, Uncertainty, and Policy Choice in the European Parliament

Delivery and Returns see our delivery rates and policies thinking of returning an item? See our Returns Policy. Visit our Help Pages.

Zuckerberg's EU testimony: what he didn't answer

It illustrates how legislators make broadly representative decisions under conditions of resource scarcity, informational uncertainty, and problematic policy preferences, and how structurally weak EP parties can act in an internally cohesive and externally competitive manner when carrying out their policy commitments to Europe's citizens.

Read more Read less. Oxford University Press; 1 edition December 13, Language: Be the first to review this item Amazon Best Sellers Rank: Related Video Shorts 0 Upload your video. Customer reviews There are no customer reviews yet. Share your thoughts with other customers. Write a customer review.

Who Decides, and How?

Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers. Learn more about Amazon Giveaway.

Who Decides, and How?: Set up a giveaway. There's a problem loading this menu right now.

What Do the People Want?: eupinions - OPINIONS, MOODS AND PREFERENCES OF EUROPEAN CITIZENS

How do individual legislators in the European Parliament EP make decisions? Despite a flourishing literature on the European Union's only directly elected institution, we know surprisingly little about the micro-foundations of EP politics. This book's principal argument is that members of the EP MEPs make decisions on the basis of perceived preference coherence.

When lacking the resources and expertise to make fully informed decisions on most policy proposals, MEPs adopt the positions of those expert colleagues in the responsible legislative committee whose preferences over policy outcomes When lacking the resources and expertise to make fully informed decisions on most policy proposals, MEPs adopt the positions of those expert colleagues in the responsible legislative committee whose preferences over policy outcomes they perceive to most closely match their own. Given that these preferences are difficult to determine, legislators rely on a shared party label as a stand-in for common preferences.

If nonexpert legislators demand information about how the proposed policy positions relate to their most preferred outcomes, policy experts provide it in the form of focal points, which summarize and evaluate the expected implications of the legislation.

Nils Ringe

Using both quantitative and qualitative data, the book explicitly investigates policy-making processes and outcomes. This not only helps us explain how individual legislators make decisions, it also sheds light on the nature and role of parties and committees in EP politics.