Christian Answers to the Theory of Evolution

Christian Answers to the Theory of Evolution: Respectful Disagreement with Evolutionary Science [James M. Lowrance] on leondumoulin.nl *FREE* shipping on .
Table of contents

I appreciate the simple and thorough explanations concerning the differences of the two belief systems. I highly recommend this reading for any one who has questions or concerns about the theory of evolution vs creationism. See all 3 reviews. Amazon Giveaway allows you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers.

Learn more about Amazon Giveaway. Christian Answers to the Theory of Evolution: Respectful Disagreement with Evolutionary Science. Set up a giveaway. There's a problem loading this menu right now. Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations.

View or edit your browsing history. Get to Know Us.

English Choose a language for shopping. Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Evolution is just a theory and nothing more, nothing can be proven to complete fact. Adam and Eve on the other hand are complete truth, as God himself teaches us. I firmly believe in Christian and evolution, but not in a normal way.

Did Jesus believe in evolution. If you think Jesus believed in evolution then read this first: Wellman, its Tate again.

Why do so many scientists endorse Evolution? • leondumoulin.nl

I am presenting to my class about how people today are not very religious and personally not religious enough and wanted to get a quick interview with you if its not too much trouble. Do any of the other religions have a more dedicated following as of late? This decline in morality includes a steep rise in sexual immorality and promiscuous behavior; the large growth of profanity, even among youth; the growth of rudeness and decline of patience overall in society, and again, the spike in crime that continues to increase every year, particularly violent crime like assaults.

Easy to say but so very hard to do but through Christ, we can do all things Phil 4: They want creature comforts and easy lives. Jesus is still calling out men and women to follow Him. It is an all-or-nothing call. Discipleship is a call to follow Jesus, to obey what He taught, and to be about discipline others — whether in the church or in the world. You can not be nor can I be a disciple of Christ unless I deny my own self-interests and take up my cross, daily.

Luke chapter 14 and 9 are great reads for anyone interested in knowing more about discipleship. The answer is yes, Christians are to make disciples of others and themselves be discipled. He already has all authority for us to do this Matthew Is this not part of the Great Commission to go into all the world…even if its starts with your next door neighbor?

The emphasis you put on the difference between Scientific Law and Scientific Principle is something I think a lot of struggling Christians will find comfort in. I wish more Christians would explore and understand how science works so that when theories and principles arise they know what is worth questioning. In a scientific field you are taught to question everything and believe what can be visibly proven; while Christianity is faith based. We know God created the universe, I believe He initiated the big bang — matter cannot be created, nor destroyed.

From that point forward, God used the laws of of the universe to mould life into what we know today. In the Bible, it says Adam was made from the dust. On a scientific level, atoms and the elements are also referred to dust. They cannot yet explain how life started — my answer, God and science will one day tell me how He did it!

From dust, He lead evolution. We sing a popular song about God being the potter, and we the clay, and how He moulds us. In the same way, God took the dust and started moulding, starting with single celled bacteria and later the dinosaurs not mentioned in the Bible yet we know they existed and they eventually evolved into the animals we know today.

Somewhere along the line, the hominids began, and they were shaped and moulded until God perfected them, a being made in His image; man was created. Evolution only tells me how God created us, it by no means disproves that God exists. Nor does this in any way disprove the Bible! The Bible was written by and for people who live a time long ago. No one can dispute that our general level of intelligence and understanding far exceeds that of those who lived even years ago.

The people in the biblical times simply would not have grasped these concepts and so it is understandable that all these details were not included. It would be comparable to trying to explain postgraduate chemistry to a toddler.. The Bible must be read in context — just as we need to read each verses in context, so we also need to understand the context of the time that it was written in.

Christians should not fear science and try to disprove it. Instead we should be embracing it, marveling at the incredible discoveries and supporting science.. It does not in anyway disprove the He exists, to me it only strengthens the proof that He does! As a fellow Christian I agree totally with what you have written except one little point where you say that Christianity is Faith based.

I think saying this is actually inaccurate and makes people who are yet to become Christians think that you cannot use reason to decide to follow Christ and that it is just a leap of Faith with no good evidence. If evolution were real profound evolution we would have to see monkeys and man in different stages of evolution. NO of course not.

This is an interesting article. Some of your terminology is quite a bit off though. With a hypothesis, generally you look at several consistent observations and then create a specific, directional, falsifiable prediction based on the observations. After supported hypotheses build up, you create a theory, which is a general and strong explanation behind the phenomena that unifies the hypotheses.

Christian Answers to the Theory of Evolution

A hypothesis is falsiable. Firstly, the big bang was not an explosion. It was an expansion of space-time. I had planned to teach evolution thru the way that it was gods plan but not sure how to explain humans? Evolution is only a theory. The Bible states God created mankind in His own image Gen 1: The idea that man evolved into a human being has never been proven to be true. For us, that is enough. Besides, theories are not the same as scientific facts, and certainly biblical truth. This article is very interesting and helpful however I am grappling with one thing, and that is how can you be a Christian and not believe in creation?

The whole idea of creation is that it is a miracle, it highlights the awesomeness of our God. Believing in creation requires faith. However I believe in micro-evolution as there is evidence of this. But as for the origin of life on earth, I believe my sovereign God created everything. You either believe the whole thing or nothing at all. After all these years I wish to delve into the literature of this sort of occurrance. It might be fair to set down my account before partaking of others good fortune. I was washing the dishes this Friday evening while a party of young folk was getting going in the rest of the house to which I presumed I had no right to mingle as I had no one of my age to mingle with and an intrusion into paired or unpaired youngsters late teens, early twenties would not be appreciated.

I had not planned to step out either, so I was just floating, but for the moment restrained to the kitchen and the dishes in the sink needed to be readied for future use. Simply, I was doing the dishes. It came as an awakening into a surprise, I felt a something had happened ; I became aware that I was hanging overtop my head, in the form of an elongated droplet suspended downward from a surface that was above me, like an inverted lake, all crystal clear, all light and the substance of which was simply love. I knew that there was a Christian tradition to this effect or something but had not taken it literally.

I the droplet felt fear because the Me that was hanging in this precarious form, a droplet of liquid could break away and be gone, or alternatively I could be sucked up by the force of surface tension which was what was keeping me stuck to the surface into this ocean and I d be no more. So either way I felt I might be annihilated. The rewards however in being this eternal globual made the fear vanishe I got used to it very quickly indeed , because this I, this far away absolute I which belonged to me was also part of this much much vaster situation, in fact the words which came to me very quickly were, eh, Jesus said it and here I see, the Father and I are one.

And not only am I I which sees by means of this clear droplet, but I m His witness, the observer, the very distant bystander, so far removed from the regular going on which are still here, …. But what I am seeing from this No Time Zone is something that shines from within itself and very evidently is uncreated, and needs no creating, so something has been fooling me that all things come and go. This thing sees, knows my thoughts on instant before I do and is really near me but at this point is no longer the same me as started some instants ago….

I slipped from just witnessing into a more rounded place lower down, seeing the dream that I was in and the curvature of space all around me…. And yes, this is a familiar thing that I d somehow forgotten and now that it s happening and its so totally natural this extra presence is so easy to take and so belongs, I m into a new era and thats so nice.

And yes it has a Face, the Face of Father, made out of light which shines from its own internal source but yet relates to the ambient kitchen light because where the white walls reflect the bulb the most, that is where the love seems concentrated into strings. And the face looks at me with recognizable expression, ———-—compassion but inaction and somewhere I become aware of its Isness….. I ve left out that as my head had turned anticlockwise, from easterly to northerly, there over the frig which was humming as friges do, was Buddah Consciousness, awareness but no face; it took the full turn to the west to see the face which had no distinguishing features; what I remember is Father, Compassion, and within the Face in readable print or something the clear words SAT CHIT ANANDA which I took to be a revelation of Its name.

And that It knew everything, specifically my thoughts,my degree of sincerety.. I have also left out the most striking feature of the Face, its increadible beauty; it left me astonished that such a thing could be.. There was also the emptyness in the corner where the kitchen closet is, but this emptyness seemed the be the specific organ of knowing the past prestent and future…. I was a bit astonished that it should be down toward the floor, whereas the face was well over the table. He s real, he s right here. It is not anacdotal at all.

Steve wanting to be a rascal or make it plainer than words, reached out with both arms to eye level, palms open, and grasped one of the tendons of reflected light and played like he was trying to stretch it……. They left, no big deal to them apparently. So I was left closer to the doorway now looking back into the kitchen. I think that at this point the phone rang and the atmosphere changed, someone was being recalled home.

The party was collapsing. I think that the whole episode left my mind, not forgotten but fallow, until maybe three months later when during conversation I first told it to my supervisor, Jung Mar, a somewhat cultured Chinese immigrant from Hong Kong to Canada who was an engineer by training but still retained a bit of the classic Chinese heritage. I dont know how he took it exactly, but probably it did me no harm. Whenever else I ve told it s brought me no harm, though the immmediate reason that I m typing it out now is that a hitch hicker in Toronto suggested that I do.

Contrary to expectation,the vision has never reoccured. Jews tend to dismiss the story ….. The content of the vision included seeing Life, but also the great loneliness of this Face of Father who also seemed to be somewhat dreamed out while being the stuff of life. The clearest allusion to the Vision is in the Swami Vivedananda writings, where his guru, Ramakrishna, promised the Vision, not just the dogmas and the theories.. I m not familiar with the exact circumstance. Ramakrishna does respond to someones criticism of suicide by saying that for those who have seen god, suicide is no sin.

The writings of Meher Baba ….. Baba Hari Das in Santa Cruz holds annual workshops and practically promises the vision through something called tradition ceremonies…..

What is Kobo Super Points?

I m tempted to attend someday. The best allusions occur in the writings of Bhagawan Sathya Sai Baba, who s writings must proceed from a thorough knowledge of spiritual reality. However he belittles short Visions such as mine, holding out for persisting Vision, however only one of his disciples claims to have seen god but are quite satisfied that to see Baba is to see god. Moslems almost univervaly consider the claim as outrage or blasphamy, although one prominent one conceeds that at death it might occur to a supremely righteous individual.

To me it is an unfinished episode; it has not reoccured, I have not been designated a mission, I certainly am not all knowing and suffer as a result of the disparity, but of course it s a healthy sort of suffering. I ve lost belief that it will occur during my life or at death. The main benefit is that I am able to console people who are dying or close to someone dying that you dont actually die, something happens, there is need for a funeral, but dont worry, it does not end in a toilet flush.

I ve spelt out my dissatisfaction to this division of identity and all that in a document called A Propolal for Better God -Man Relations. I also cooked myself up a soup called G7….. God in Seven Parts.. I think that I saw a subtil allusion to this Vision in the writings of the Tibetan, Trumpa Rinpoche, kind of hoping too that the Vision might come to him again…. Oh yeh, there is the credible chap in California who has me believing that he s had it three times…. I havent been able to talk it over with him…a bit elusive. So now I am free to look up the literature on the Beautific Vision…..


  1. Comparative Judicial Review and Public Policy (Contributions in Political Science).
  2. Expertise. Insights. Illumination..
  3. Relevant questions.
  4. Christian Answers to the Theory of Evolution Audiobook | James M. Lowrance | leondumoulin.nl.

I think that Theresa of Avila makes a gentle alluson to it…. I just dont believe that austerities are legitimate ways of attaining to it. Better have a near death experiences. I m not much for it, I ve not known it to work for me, I do not hesitate to assert that God knows my thouthts… as who s having them anyway…but there is no guaranteed personal practice that works.. I m on the look out for evidence of fulfilments, but it s sporadic at best and illusory at worst. Despite his prolific—and time-consuming—activity in the public arena, he keeps his molecular genetics at the cutting edge.

As in his theological debates, he enjoys challenging accepted scientific ideas. He no longer maintains a wet lab but collaborates extensively. By his ordination in he had already decided to pursue science instead of a ministerial role. At the monastery Darwinism had never been perceived as an enemy of Christian faith. So a year later, when Ayala moved to New York City to pursue a doctorate in genetics, the prevailing U.


  • Create The Life That You Want.
  • Why do so many scientists endorse Evolution?.
  • Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations.
  • At first, he recalls, his scientific colleagues were wary and took the position that researchers should not engage in religious discussions. By , when the Arkansas legislature voted to give creationism equal time in schools, the mood began to change. The booklet became the Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences.

    Even so, some philosophers of science, such as Philip Kitcher of Columbia University, have come to believe that evolution and belief in a providential creator cannot coincide.

    iTunes is the world's easiest way to organize and add to your digital media collection.

    When two thirds of the public profess a commitment to creationism, argues Stanford University evolutionary biologist Joan E. Roughgarden, the situation is dire. The daughter of Episcopalian missionaries, Roughgarden says she meets believers on their turf—and has even given sermons on evolution from the pulpit.

    More from the same

    The heart of the debate rests not in theological concepts like explaining evil, she insists, but in the pews.