e-book I Swear to You, Adolf Hitler, Fealty and Obedience : Sin and Retribution 2

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online I Swear to You, Adolf Hitler, Fealty and Obedience : Sin and Retribution 2 file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with I Swear to You, Adolf Hitler, Fealty and Obedience : Sin and Retribution 2 book. Happy reading I Swear to You, Adolf Hitler, Fealty and Obedience : Sin and Retribution 2 Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF I Swear to You, Adolf Hitler, Fealty and Obedience : Sin and Retribution 2 at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF I Swear to You, Adolf Hitler, Fealty and Obedience : Sin and Retribution 2 Pocket Guide.
I Swear to You, Adolf Hitler, Fealty and Obedience: Sin and Retribution 2 - Kindle edition by Adalbert Lallier. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device.
Table of contents

Shop with confidence

Although popes claim to be the "vicar of Christ", you have to wonder sometimes if they have even read the words of Jesus. If interpretted very narrowly, the passage below shows how far from the standard that Jesus set for representatives and followers the Catholic hierarchy have behaved where the children within their own flocks are concerned. Whoever becomes humble like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me. Woe to the world because of stumbling blocks!


  • Dan Carter and the Great Carved Face.
  • Fairy Tales of Hans Christian Andersen.
  • The Crater:Seven Days of Terror in Putnam County!
  • Granma Told Us. . .;
  • Jawabsale- Best Place for Deals & Discounts Online!.
  • BE THE FIRST TO KNOW;
  • Cobwebs From an Empty Skull.

Occasions for stumbling are bound to come, but woe to the one by whom the stumbling block comes! Take care that you do not despise one of these little ones; for, I tell you, in heaven their angels continually see the face of my Father in heaven. What do you think? If a shepherd has a hundred sheep, and one of them has gone astray, does he not leave the ninety—nine on the mountains and go in search of the one that went astray? And if he finds it, truly I tell you, he rejoices over it more than over the ninety—nine that never went astray. So it is not the will of your Father in heaven that one of these little ones should be lost.

Can you imagine, however, that Jesus would have limited his concern to "stumbling blocks", or to the spiritual well—being of children of the Catholic flock? I can't help but believe that in the middle of the Jewish Holocaust he would have said something like "Whoever saves a child not to mention his innocent parents and grandparents from Hitler, saves ME.

Blessed are you when people revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who went before you. Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child, and children will rise against parents and have them put to death; and you will be hated by all because of my name.

But the one who endures to the end will be saved. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebul, how much more will they malign those of his household! What I say to you in the dark, tell in the light; and what you hear whispered, proclaim from the housetops.

List of Latin phrases (full)

Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell. And if your eye causes you to stumble, tear it out and throw it away; it is better for you to enter life with one eye than to have two eyes and to be thrown into the hell of fire. Whether or not it lost its soul in the bargain, God alone may know for sure. Why, in the mean time, would the Catholic Church want to canonize this man?!? What would Jesus do?

When Jesus was asked to clarify what the second of the two great commandments was all about, he explained in one of his the most important parables, that action speaks louder than words, and that GOD is not fooled by professions of faith, nor by what may appear lack of faith. What GOD appreciates and expects in people is a good heart which moves one to "love others as one does oneself", and to "do unto others what one would have others do unto them".

Jesus went out of his way, in his "Parable of the Good Samaritan" to point out that GOD often finds what he is looking for, not in churchy people who hold the right "beliefs", but in "non—believers" who do the right "works". Whoever called this the parable of "the Good Samaritan", may have missed the point, because Jesus didn't just highlight the genuineness of the one non—believer. He contrasted that charitable behavior to the phoniness of the two religious leaders. Why not refer to this as "the parable of the Faithless Churchmen"?

One day an expert on Moses' laws came to test Jesus' orthodoxy by asking him this question: "Teacher, what does a man need to do to live forever in heaven? And you must love your neighbor just as much as you love yourself. They stripped him of his clothes and money, and beat him up and left him lying half dead beside the road. By chance a priest came along; and when he saw the man lying there, he crossed to the other side of the road and passed him by. A temple—assistant walked over and looked at him lying there, but then went on.

(PDF) Vatican Assassins | Heinz Duthel - leondumoulin.nl

Kneeling beside him the Samaritan soothed his wounds with medicine and bandaged them. Then he put the man on his donkey and walked along beside him till they came to an inn, where he nursed him through the night. The next day he handed the innkeeper two silver coins and told him to take care of the man. Now if Jesus expressed this much concern for one Jew, who was only mugged and robbed, how much more concern would he feel for six million Jews and millions of Christian and other victims as well?

See these contrasts to the timidity of "the Holy See" : the Conscience of Nazi Germany , where we show how a simple Austrian Catholic farmer named "Franz Jagerstatter" figured out what the entire German hierarchy combined was unable to do, namely what to think and say about the Nazi regime, even if it meant suffering a martyr's death.

The Germans did nothing to him, to his parishioners, to Jews married to Catholics, or to Catholics who had converted from Judaism. That the Pope would bring danger upon himself and the Church for speaking out was then, and is now, a convenient fiction. For After the Allies liberated Rome on June 4, , the Germans were in the process of gradually deporting the Jews of Trieste, which they still occupied. The Pope and the Vatican were completely safe. More than half a year had passed since Bishop Santin's appeal. Fifteen of the twenty—two trains that brought almost twelve hundred Jews mostly to Auschwitz departed Trieste when i.

Quietly, behind the scenes, Plus XII personally could have also done many things to try to help the Jews, particularly of Italy, with no risk to himself or the Church.

I Swear to You, Adolf Hitler, Fealty and Obedience By Adalbert Lallier

He chose not to. A powerful summary : I know of no one who makes the case for the gravity of the moral failure of the Catholic pope and hierarchy when it came to guiding its faithful during the holocaust than Daniel Goldhagen, who wrote the following:. The Church did not tell Catholics that with every antisemitic act of omission or of participation — most obviously by actively participating, in any way, in the mass annihilation of the Jews — they committed a crime against humanity and a sin against God.

The Church thereby allowed Catholics to place their souls at risk for an eternity in hell. According to the Church, the failure to have warned Catholics is a sin because we incur the "responsibility for the sins committed by others" by "not disclosing them when we have an obligation to do so.


  • Super Hero besties in the big 6.
  • Shop by category.
  • The Inventions of Professor Mctavish.
  • Sin and Retribution 2.
  • A Peace without Honor.
  • Hidden Enemies;

The Church, Pius XII, and the clergy some of this applies also to Pius XI allowed Catholics to persecute and perpetrate unjust harm upon Jews for one of two reasons: because the churchmen did not conceive of the anti—Jewish onslaught, including the mass killing, as crimes; or because they thought the various components of the German—led violent eliminationist persecution were crimes and, with their silence, chose to allow act of omission Catholics to commit them that is, when they were not also encouraging the criminal acts themselves.

From the standpoint of Catholics, I am not sure which is worse: a Church and Church leaders morally bankrupt or even criminal because they were so besotted by doctrinal hatred and enmity that they gave their moral blessing to one of the greatest crimes in human history, or a Church and Church leaders morally bankrupt or even criminal because, for their own, perhaps political, reasons, they willfully ignored their duty to warn their members against committing deeds they knew to be criminal, and therefore willfully permitted millions of their members to imperil their souls.

It is likely that some combination of both existed, but I find it hard to believe that the overwhelming majority of the Church's European clergy thought that Catholics were committing grievous crimes and mortal sins including in the nonlethal phases of the eliminationist onslaught and allowed them to do so by saying nothing.

Adolf Hitler: Religionist: Naziism as a Genuine Religion by Americanus Verus Ame

The bishops and priests would have had to be adopting this difficult and inexplicable position day after day, for years on end. After all, the Church made clear, right up front, that its fiery encyclical Mit brennender Sorge was "prompted by the desire, as it behooves Us, to secure for Germany the freedom of the Church's beneficent mission and the salvation of the souls in her care. By implication, the silent churchmen did not judge "the salvation of the souls in her care" to be endangered by Catholics' participation in the eliminationist persecution of the Jews.

Germany's Cardinal Faulhaber had declared it "a duty of conscience to speak out" against the so—called Euthanasia program, "for as a Catholic bishop I may not remain silent when the preservation of the moral foundations of all public order is at stake. Pius XII himself had proclaimed in his first encyclical that his greatest duty was "to testify to the truth with Apostolic Firmness. The Church's willingness to allow Catholics and its clergy to persecute and even kill Jews appears, therefore, more likely to have resulted from the belief that the members of their flock were not endangering their souls — that such acts were not crimes, offenses, or sins.

We see then that it is not just the Jewish victims and their families who should be calling for a moral reckoning with the Catholic Church. The call should be coming and to a small degree is coming also from Catholics. The Church betrayed its Catholic flock by the tens of millions. Although each one, victimized Jew and morally abandoned Catholic, has a special claim on witnessing such a reckoning, we need not be Jew or Catholic to have a legitimate stake in it.

We need not be afflicted Jews or Catholics, or their actual or spiritual descendants. All people have the right, indeed the duty, to engage in moral judgment of significant public events, institutions, and actors. All people have the right and the duty to urge that the conclusions that correctly follow on that moral judgment be widely known and be acted upon. Although such a moral reckoning will serve everyone, no one has a more urgent need for it than the Catholic Church itself, which does not yet know how to call for what it must.

I have limited myself in these pages to the Roman Catholic church's neglect of the moral well—being of its own members. That is not to say that the moral well—being of Catholics — even millions of Catholics — is more important than the loss of their physical lives by 6 million Jews and 4 million others. Far from it. Introduction : I was raised as a very pious, quite conservative Roman Catholic. A picture is worth a thousand words. Article 16 Before bishops take possession of their dioceses they are to take an oath of fealty either to the Reich Representative of the State concerned, or to the President of the Reich, according to the following formula : Before God and on the Holy Gospels I swear and promise as becomes a bishop, loyalty to the German Reich and to the [regional - EC] State of.