Manual Second Fastest Gun

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Second Fastest Gun file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Second Fastest Gun book. Happy reading Second Fastest Gun Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Second Fastest Gun at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Second Fastest Gun Pocket Guide.
Feb 16, - The highest rate of fire for a machine gun in service is the M Minigun. It fires mm caliber rounds at a blistering rate of 6, rounds per minute, or rounds per second — about ten times that of an ordinary machine gun, according to the Guinness World Records.
Table of contents

Kickstarter is not a store. It's a way to bring creative projects to life. Learn more about accountability. Select this reward.


  • onahedlyuon.
  • Caustic Culture;
  • Study Privately For The Bar: Real Property, Constitutional law, Contracts, Torts: (Prime Members Can Read This Book Free) (A law school e book);
  • Free History Books for Kindle: Easy Step-by-Step Guide.
  • Navigation menu!

Ships to Anywhere in the world. Shipping destination. Get a print copy of the regular cover release.

Get a printed copy of the black and white interior edition of Ric McClune - Signed by three of the contributors. Get a print copy of the exclusive kickstarter virgin cover edition. Limited 1 backer. Signed by Ben Sullivan. I also analyzed my reaction times using a timer that Jump to.

Farm machinery outdraws even ‘fastest gun’

Sections of this page. Accessibility help. Email or Phone Password Forgotten account? Log In. Forgotten account? Not Now. Visitor Posts. Jaime G.

Ric McClune: Second Fastest Gun in the West #1

Jaramillo Jr. Hello sir I'm from Taiwan and wish you can do a review about buying Information about Page Insights data. Top shooters show the guns they use, and explain why they chose them. This is the third of four videos in the second round of "Masters Series" videos.

I'd li Fast Draw - What Gun do you use, and why? Top shooters share their tips for new shooters. In this video we look at the hand position they found works best for them. This is the second of four videos Fast Draw - Hand Position. In this video we look at how they use the Dry Fire Area in their competition prep. This is the first of four Two-minute initial no-voting period? Here's a metrics question: Of the questions that have the first 2 answers within 10 minutes, what's the upvote difference between the first and second answers, and is that upvote difference statistically significant?

Jason S Jason S 6, 2 2 gold badges 25 25 silver badges 35 35 bronze badges. It's a slow query, but here it is. I know you asked for up-votes only, but the query took seconds as is! Upvotes and downvotes are NOT the point!!! The point is the best usage of our collective time. A proper statistic would be how different the responses during the first 5 or 10 minutes are.

Ric McClune: Second Fastest Gun in the West

Difficult to measure, but in my experience you will see a lot of repetition and thus waste of time. My suggestion is similar to Greg's.

But instead of delaying every vote for 5 minutes, I would: show the answers immediately, but show no votes at all except your own for the first 10 minutes or so after the question has been posted. For viewers, instead of 0 the vote field could display votes show in 3 min. Then after the 10 minutes have passed, all votes will be displayed at once, and the usual process takes place, as it is right now no more delays. The part of my old answer for which I got some down-votes and the bashing comments below: I really feel this being a big problem. But this process is: not really comfortable, since I have to go over my answer at least twice and I find it kind of stressfull to be one of the fastest guns in the west especially when some "popups" show how many others have answered in the mean time.

Sometimes it results in weird comments that are only valid for a couple of minutes, until I have filled in detailed examples. Here is an example where I even got a down-vote that was not corrected after I re-edited my answer. DaveBall aka user DaveBall aka user 2 2 silver badges 10 10 bronze badges.

Second Fastest Gun by Perry Curtis Bales

Reading the above, I feel you are part of the problem, not suffering it? I'd say the problem is the system and the voters. Furthermore, I do improve my answers quite quickly, and when I vote answers up, I look through other answers and upvote similar ones as well, even if they don't have upvotes yet. If you're getting "weird comments" and even downvotes, then I'd say your first answer was just not ready for posting.

So, you're just trying to get to be the first answerer, as you're aware that first answers are likely to get more votes? I dislike that, a lot. I try to post only when the first answer does make sense already. I checked 10 of your answers, 9 of them edited by yourself afterwards. Sure I edit after posting too, sometimes even in the 5 minute grace period. But I've never received weird comments or downvotes for any first revision. And I surely don't post partial answers knowing that I am ging to improve it right away. How many of those 10 were first answers? I haven't looked for that. In fact I do like it when people improve their answers And I think the same applies for me: I used to write very thorough answers that subsume several others and therefore were committed quite late.

The others all got a lot of upvotes, mine maybe 1 or 2 by "late viewers". Only after several such situations I changed my behavior and started to list all the aspects, then commit the answer and later-on edit the answer if I want to add details to the aspects. I don't see how my comments could be interpreted as bashing, but they surely were not intended that way. Sorry about that. That aside: I wonder if the quick non-revoked downvote on your example is related to this. To me, it surely is an example of FGITW: a single-line answer posted within 3 minutes after the question was asked, and then enhanced a lot 7 to 12 minutes later.

But why couldn't the downvoter simply disagree with both the short and long answer? Sure, maybe he disagreed and did not comment on it.

SIGN UP FOR THE LATEST ANIMATION ART NEWS

I did feel a little bashed here because I mainly want to give good answers, only secondly fast ones. Furthermore, many others have mentioned in this thread that they are using the same technique, without getting down-votes. That no longer seemed objective to me. Some strategies that I have tried: Answer only questions that have been unanswered for a couple of hours.

Challenges: To skip questions with only wrong answers usually just one or two. Not providing additional points of view.

Shop Products

Answer only questions that after a couple of hours have only 3 answers. Challenges: In many cases the 3 answers are duplicate and possibly wrong ones. Very few questions to answer at all; usually only those very badly stated. Additionally, I have noticed that duplicate answers are produced even after much more time than writing it would have normally required.

A bit off-topic, but this would mean: a We are extremely slow typists, b Many of us abandons SOf for important periods, only to come back and press "submit", c We answer questions without reading previous answers, or d We answer question after reading previous answers, probably trying to synthesize the best of them. Be the fastest gun in town and try to announce to others my intention of producing an answer with a one-liner, leaving up to them to judge if my sketched answer sounds good enough or not. Challenges: Other contributors percieving that that's all the answer I'm going to produce and elaborating on it precisely what I'm trying to avoid.

Current Like 3, but being explicit in my intentions of ellaboration. Challenges: Wishfully none. None of them has worked very well so far. Also useful: the ability to queue questions that I have chosen not to answer for later review. If this information is already available, please let me know how to access it. Mario Rossi Mario Rossi 6 6 bronze badges. No, please don't "solve" this problem by doing 3. That's precisely the problem. My proposition is to have the site informing the user that other people is already working on answers as soon as they enter the first character.

While interesting, new users may find this pretty demotivating.