Energy Infrastructure Protection and Homeland Security (Homeland Security Series) [Frank R. Spellman] on leondumoulin.nl *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Table of contents
- Energy Infrastructure Protection and Homeland Security : Frank R. Spellman :
- National Infrastructure Protection Plan
- Bestselling Series
The Quest Daniel Yergin. The Prize Daniel Yergin. Carbon Democracy Timothy Mitchell. Out of the Desert Ali Al-Naimi. The Frackers Gregory Zuckerman. The Water Wizard Viktor Schauberger. Introduction to Energy Analysis Evert Nieuwlaar. The Boom Russell Gold. The Energy Evolution Viktor Schauberger. The Fertile Earth Viktor Schauberger. Burn Out Dieter Helm. Other books in this series. Protecting Our Ports Suzette R. The State and Terrorism Dr.
Fostering Community Resilience Justin Miller. Critical infrastructure protection requires the development of a national capability to identify and monitor the critical elements and to determine when and if the elements are under attack or are the victim of destructive natural occurrences. CIP is important because it is the link between risk management and infrastructure assurance. It provides the capability needed to eliminate potential vulnerabilities in the critical infrastructure. CIP practitioners determine vulnerabilities and analyze alternatives in order to prepare for incidents.
They focus on improving the capability to detect and warn of impending attacks on, and system failures within, the critical elements of the national infrastructure. PDD mandated the formation of a national structure for critical infrastructure protection.
Energy Infrastructure Protection and Homeland Security : Frank R. Spellman :
The different entities of the national CIP structure work together as a partnership between the government and the public sectors. Each department and agency of the federal government is responsible for protecting its portion of the government's critical infrastructure. In addition, there are grants made available through the Department of Homeland Security for municipal and private entities to use for CIP and security purposes.
These include grants for emergency management, water security training, rail, transit and port security, metropolitan medical response, LEA terrorism prevention programs and the Urban Areas Security Initiative. PDD identified certain functions related to critical infrastructure protection that must be performed chiefly by the federal government. These are national defense, foreign affairs, intelligence, and law enforcement. Each lead agency for these special functions appoints a senior official to serve as a functional coordinator for the federal government.
For each of the identified major sectors of the critical infrastructure, the federal government appointed a Sector Liaison Official from a designated Lead Agency. A private sector counterpart, a Sector Coordinator, was also identified. Together, the two sector representatives, one federal government and one corporate, were responsible for developing a sector NIAP. In addition, each department and agency of the federal government was responsible for developing its own CIP plan for protecting its portion of the federal government's critical infrastructure. Additionally the national structure must ensure there is a national CIP program.
This program includes responsibilities such as education and awareness, threat assessment and investigation, and research. There have been public criticisms of the mechanisms and implementation of some security initiatives and grants, with claims they are being led by the same companies who can benefit, [12] and that they are encouraging an unnecessary culture of fear.
Commentators note that these initiatives started directly after the collapse of the Cold War , raising the concern that this was simply a diversion of the military-industrial complex away from a funding area which was shrinking and into a richer previously civilian arena. Grants have been distributed across the different states even though the perceived risk is not evenly spread, leading to accusations of pork barrel politics that directs money and jobs towards marginal voting areas.
The Urban Areas Security Initiative grant program has been particularly controversial, with the infrastructure list covering 77, assets, including a popcorn factory and a hot dog stand. An absence of comparative risk analysis and benefits tracking it has made it difficult to counter such allegations with authority. In order to better understand this, and ultimately direct effort more productively, a Risk Management and Analysis Office was recently created in the National Protection and Programs directorate at the Department of Homeland Security. Department of Defense is responsible for protecting its portion of the government's critical infrastructure.
But as part of the CIP program, DoD has responsibilities that traverse both the national and department-wide critical infrastructure. PDD identified the responsibilities DoD had for critical infrastructure protection. First, DoD had to identify its own critical assets and infrastructures and provide assurance through analysis, assessment, and remediation. DoD was also responsible for identifying and monitoring the national and international infrastructure requirements of industry and other government agencies, all of which needed to be included in the protection planning.
DoD also addressed the assurance and protection of commercial assets and infrastructure services in DoD acquisitions. Other DoD responsibilities for CIP included assessing the potential impact on military operations that would result from the loss or compromise of infrastructure service. There were also requirements for monitoring DoD operations, detecting and responding to infrastructure incidents, and providing department indications and warnings as part of the national process.
Ultimately, DoD was responsible for supporting national critical infrastructure protection. In response to the requirements identified in PDD, DoD categorized its own critical assets by sector, in a manner similar to the national CIP organization. The DoD identified a slightly different list of infrastructure sectors for those areas that specifically required protection by DoD. There are ten defense critical infrastructure sectors that are protected by the DoD. The DoD CIP special function components interface with the equivalent national functional coordinators and coordinate all activities related to their function within DoD.
They include the following components:.
- National Infrastructure Protection Plan - Wikipedia;
- Nine Mil!
- Climate Change, Ethics and Human Security.
- Top Authors.
- How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing (Lifetools: Books for the Gener?
- Energy Infrastructure Protection and Homeland Security.
- Navigation menu.
As mandated by PDD, the DoD must protect its portion of the federal government's critical infrastructure. Protecting the Defense Infrastructure is a complex task involving ten defense sectors. It was deemed that it was nearly impossible to protect every critical asset at every location, therefore the focus was directed on protecting the critical Defense Infrastructure. The critical Defense Infrastructure is the critical assets essential to providing mission assurance. The six phases of the DoD CIP life cycle build on one another to create a framework for a comprehensive solution for infrastructure assurance.
The life cycle phases occur before, during, and after an event that may compromise or degrade the infrastructure.
National Infrastructure Protection Plan
A synopsis of the six phases are:. Effective management of the CIP life cycle ensures that protection activities can be coordinated and reconciled among all DoD sectors. Achieving success means obtaining mission assurance. Missing the mark can mean mission failure as well as human and material losses. For critical infrastructure protection, risk management requires leveraging resources to address the most critical infrastructure assets that are also the most vulnerable and that have the greatest threat exposure. The most important part of the CIP lifecycle is Phase 1.
Because it is crucial to target the right assets for infrastructure protection, determining these assets is the first phase in the CIP life cycle. This phase, Analysis and Assessment, is the key and foundation of the seven lifecycle activities. Without a solid foundation, the remaining CIP life cycle phases may be flawed, resulting in a CIP plan that fails to protect the critical infrastructure and, therefore, mission assurance. Phase 1 determines what assets are important, and identifies their vulnerabilities, and dependencies so that decision makers have the information they need to make effective risk management choices.
The Defense Infrastructure, or DI, is organized into ten sectors.
Bestselling Series
Each sector is composed of assets, such as systems, programs, people, equipment, or facilities. Assets may be simple, such as one facility within one geographic location, or complex, involving geographically dispersed links and nodes. The Analysis and Assessment is made up of five steps that include activities that span and encompass the ten DI sectors and their assets.
- Second Edition;
- RESISTORS.
- Top Authors?
- Mechanisms of Lymphocyte Activation and Immune Regulation VIII: Autoimmunity 2000 and Beyond: v. 8 (.
- Smugglers Ridge?
Tier 1 assets are assets that could cause mission failure if they are compromised or damaged. Computer Forensics Marie-Helen Maras. Energy and the Wealth of Nations Kent Klitgaard. Energy Transitions Vaclav Smil. Killers of the Flower Moon David Grann. Private Empire Steve Coll. Energy Professor Richard Rhodes. Century of War F. Oil Shock Elisabetta Bini. Sustainable Energy - without the hot air David J. Oil Morgan Patrick Downey. Understanding Oil Prices Salvatore Carollo. All the Money in the World John Pearson.