Get PDF One Body, Two Minds

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online One Body, Two Minds file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with One Body, Two Minds book. Happy reading One Body, Two Minds Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF One Body, Two Minds at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF One Body, Two Minds Pocket Guide.
Splitting the difference: One person, two minds simple, but metaphysically puzzling questions: In a single body, how many minds are there?
Table of contents

As neuroscientists study the brain more, they have discovered that both hemispheres are quite autonomous, capable of processing information and making decisions independently of the other. There have been reported cases where patients have had entire hemispheres removed from their brain and yet they are still capable of functioning normally despite the missing half.

Mindmelding: two brains, one consciousness?

This has been seen in both the removal of the left and the right hemisphere and seems to suggest that each half can alone be sufficient for a conscious mind. So it seems that we are not really alone, even when we are. There may be a second "you" in your body having essentially the same experiences with some exceptions of course as you do. Feel free to leave them here. Alec Options Share.

Mind-Body Problem

The split in the two hemispheres appears to correlate to differential versus integral thought processing and thinking. Either method of thought processing can orientate one to reality. Like in math, differentiation finds the slope of a curve at a given point, while integration finds the area under a curve from point A to B. Differentiation sees uniqueness and detail, whereas integration sees commonality.

For example, if a Westerner was to travel to the Orient, the integration factor would make it seem like everyone looks similar; commonality. If we stay long enough, we would start to differentiate more and more subtle differences. Normally both operations occur in the brain, with both operations self standing. Differentiation is more conscious than integration in most people. This could be due to the needs of language, as you pointed out. One can see the process of differentiation in science, which generates and collect data faster; differential, than it processes or integrates it.

Differential is 2-D whereas integral is 3-D. Relative to emotions, love and hate have a connection to integral and differential thinking, respectively. Love integrates people with each other. Love seeks commonality; family and friends. Hate is more differential since it isolates and differentiates. Our emotions cross the boundaries.

Search form

Religions based on love attempt to induce integral thinking; 3-D. Racism is a composite that differentiate a subset of all people, and then integrates that subset, into an average. Making this post partly as a bump for discussion, but really I just want to point to a nice short video I've just found that illustrates my point: For those of you who are worried about the text and all that, then hopefully this will help set things up.

Bitter Crank 8. If the halves of the brain were never connected by the cerebral commissure, then two "persons" might develop from birth forward. I don't know whether this has ever happened and been observed. Severing the cerebral commissure in someone who has already developed an intellect and personality using both hemispheres of the brain results not in two persons, but two now uncoordinated hemispheres. I quite literally can not imagine what that would be like. The topic is fascinating. Some very radical brain surgeries are still done to control refractory epilepsy, such as severing connections to selected areas of one hemisphere where seizures arise.

These are often close to the language centers, so prior to doing this sort of surgery, a preliminary test is done on the exposed brain and conscious patient to map out exactly what features will be lost if the surgery is performed as planned. Sometimes it is found that too much language facility will be lost -- and then the surgery is not worth doing, even for refractory epilepsy. It should be noted that severe epilepsy that doesn't respond to medication is refractory is quite destructive--so drastic measures may be worth trying. Gazzaniga ed.

MIT Press Michael Gazzaniga. Introspection and Introspectionism in Philosophy of Cognitive Science. Edit this record. Mark as duplicate. Find it on Scholar. Request removal from index. Revision history.

Mindmelding: Consciousness, Neuroscience, and the Mind’s Privacy

This entry has no external links. Add one. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Configure custom resolver. Cyriel M. Pennartz - - Consciousness and Cognition 18 3 My personal opinion is this is tightly connected to language.

Shop this artwork

In order to be able to express coherently ourselves we need to sort out the myriad of independent threads into a single stream expressible through the speech channel that's essentially serial. Of course all is more complex than this, but I don't think this is the place to go into further details. You can get as parallel as you want if you shift your main Representation System away from digital speech to other kenestetic in particular.

Being able to parallelize two tasks involving speech may be very difficult because you would be using the "speech center" for two tasks at once and it requires a lot of training something like simultaneous translators running two "speech centers" in parallel, one for each language. There are people able to follow and answer two independent conversations at the same time, but that's not common.

OTOH using other part of our brain motion cortex in particular is possible to keep under control many "threads"; classical example is Master Chess players completely able to play 50 or more games blind! It's acknowledged they use mainly their motion cortex and do not explicitly think something like: "well, if I move my pawn in d That might be different for beings having multiple concurrent conversation channels e. Listen now. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered.

Could it be possible to augment the human mind and body to perform true multi-tasking? Asked 2 years, 2 months ago. Active 2 years, 2 months ago. Viewed times.


  • Collected Writings by John Nelson Darby Volume Twenty-Two: Doctrinal (Collected Writings of JND Book 22).
  • Changing Trends Of Election Campaign In Democratic Countries?
  • Could Two People Inhabit One Body?!
  • Surgery: An Introductory Guide.

But here are the questions: Would the structure and size of the brain and skill need to even change a lot for the true multitasking to work? So I decided to So why not engineer a system in which both brains Which is the prime mind could agree to split into two temporarily minds to perform their separate tasks, and if a conflict occurs in a decision both arms or eyes needed to be used.

Hardcore science is preferred. Anything lower is acceptable. The human body is incredible at multitasking, demonstrating capabilities that supercomputer designers only dream of.

You Are Two

If you've ever walked while holding a conversation, you've experienced just how good it is. I can back that up with hardcore science, if that's a useful answer for you.


  • Wait, what? Split brain, when two personalities live in one body – Wikimedia Blog.
  • Escape From Snod Hill;
  • BIRDS CUSTARD ISLAND: A Culinary Memoir!

Though if you do have examples of people being able to do two tasks at once as effective as just one normal person doing one. I'll be glad to read. If we create your creature, surely there will be new tasks which require its undivided attention. We are great at multitasking. For example: listening to the radio — and hearing what is said and understanding and thinking about it — while at the same time doing a complex task like programming or connecting electrical circuits, that is easy. If you are talking about splitting the mind into multiple consciousnesses , that is a different matter.

Joe Bloggs It sometimes causes hallucinations and a deep sense of fear. Thorne Thorne This idea was proposed as a throwaway minor plot element in a Robert Heinlein book: Beyond This Horizon Reasonably decent read, and is a fairly short novel in Heinleins common Juvenile style, even though the protagonist is adult.

I will vote to close this as "opinion based", but I won't refrain from giving my personal informed opinion ; It all depends on what you consider a "task" and what you consider "automatic". As said: it all depends on your definition of "task". ZioByte ZioByte 16k 2 2 gold badges 21 21 silver badges 66 66 bronze badges. Tapping into the coding power of migrants and refugees in Mexico. Featured on Meta. Update: an agreement with Monica Cellio. Related 3.

Hot Network Questions.