Free download.
Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device.
You can download and read online Word Slingers Zine 1.1 (Misunderstandings) file PDF Book only if you are registered here.
And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Word Slingers Zine 1.1 (Misunderstandings) book.
Happy reading Word Slingers Zine 1.1 (Misunderstandings) Bookeveryone.
Download file Free Book PDF Word Slingers Zine 1.1 (Misunderstandings) at Complete PDF Library.
This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats.
Here is The CompletePDF Book Library.
It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Word Slingers Zine 1.1 (Misunderstandings) Pocket Guide.
Word Slingers Zine (Misunderstandings Book 1) eBook: Writers of The Columbia Gorge: leondumoulin.nl: Kindle Store.
Table of contents
- Individual Offers
- Debates of June 18th, 2018
- What's new on playZgame ?
- Additional site navigation
- Staff Picks Searchable Acquisitions Table
The characterisation and the quality of processed by-products are also presented. The presence of trace elements and organic contaminants in variety of seafood products is highlighted. Finally, several contributions regarding advanced methodologies to determine the quality of seafood are presented.
Individual Offers
This book will be of interest to anybody concerned with quality and safety of fish throughout the entire chain from catch to consumer. If you have personal access to this content, log in with your username and password here:. New titles:. Related titles:.
Debates of June 18th, 2018
For institutional orders, please contact sales wageningenacademic. Recommend this book to a librarian. Editors J. Luten , C.
Jacobsen , K. Bekaert , A. Seafood research from fish to dish.
What's new on playZgame ?
Quality, safety and processing of wild and farmed fish. Description Full-text In this book, scientists from various disciplines address the advances in seafood research with respect to quality, safety, consumer's demands and processing of wild and farmed fish.
- The Suns Dark-Sides?
- Books library - Future.
- Delivery Boy - Erotic Novel.
- Staff Picks Searchable Acquisitions Table;
Q10 Were you able to express what you wanted? Q11 Was there something specific in the environment that you directed this message at? If yes, please state what it is. Table 2. The diaries were custom-designed so that the diary each participant had to carry looked professional and hence would make participants take the study more seriously, in addition to ensuring that study questions were available for easy look-up.
The question template was split into two parts: questions about the message made and a set of questions about the participant and her context. The first set of questions were: date, time, message media type drawing, text, photo, video, audio recording, other , title of message, and whether the message is public or private.
The message questions see Table 2. The interview consisted of the follow- ing questions: difficulty faced in filling in the diary, inspiring days and locations, media preference, environment awareness and overall experience of the past week, willingness to use a future context-aware LMM application, desire to view and write message metadata, and further participant additions. Afterwards, each participant was given a short demo of the LMM prototype, and asked to make two messages with it.
This was done as a cautionary measure as high- lighted by Burrell and Gay to ensure that participants understood what was meant by location-aware functionality. Each participant was given a personal diary and an oral explanation about the requirements of the study. Participants were required to carry the di- ary with them for approximately one week.
They were asked to make a MM photo, video, text, drawing, song or audio recording twice per day, so that by the end of the week they had a total of 14 messages. Given the stringent nature of filling in the diary twice per day, participants were told that they are allowed to make 3 messages per day if they so desired, at the cost of a message on another day.
This was done in order to make the testing con- ditions as natural as possible, under the assumption that there are days where one is more inspired to make messages than others. The messages made by participants were restricted to public places, loosely defined as any place outside of their own homes.
Since participants may not possess the necessary media capturing device at the time of making a message e. Each interview was captured by means of a tripod-anchored digital camera. After the interview, as motivational measure, each participant was awarded a e20 note and thanked for their participation. Identifying Contextual Factors in Location-Aware Multimedia Messaging and diary study to categorize the motivation responses provided by the diary-study partic- ipants.
They were asked to categorize each mes- sage under both domain and task categories Fig. The first set of domain and task categories identified were used as exemplars for subsequent classification. However, if an exemplar category did not suitably classify a given message, participants were allowed to create new categories as needed. From the 8 participants, 2 of them completed only 13 messages, which resulted in a total of MMs. The results of the categorization task provided the basis for further analyzing the diary study data, where the categorization task results were directly assimi- lated into the diary study results.
- Warfare In The Classical World.
- The Legend of Good Women.
- Navigation.
- Lesson Plans for Successful Teaching: The Importance of Watersheds;
An equal number of responses to two distinct categories resulted in classifying the message as belonging to both. The lack of video recordings could have been due to the non-availability of the media capture device e. Not surprisingly, the most chosen media type was photos, which require little cognitive effort to make. For photos made at locations, they can only give a unique perspective on the location, given the high iconic correspondence between a photograph of something at a location and the location itself.
Upon closer inspection, the reason was due to messages where participants saw it as a duty to make a message e. Indeed, such problems with participant motivation are sometimes unavoidable during requested study participation Burrell and Gay, Here, aesthetics was defined as something that offers sensori-emotional value e. Overall, the majority of the messages were about the entertainment and aesthetic domains. Here, the divergence was mainly between classifying messages as belonging to Appreciation or Criticism. Activ- ity reporting2 i.
Self-reflection i. Overall, the findings show that activity-reporting and appreciation were the most prevalent task categories.
Additional site navigation
For capturing experiences, the aim is to provide an adequate representation of a real-world experience that took place e. For the experience process however, the 2 Activity-reporting is broader than citizen journalism, which describes activities that pertain to nation- or worldwide events, and not necessarily personal events. For the latter, the concern is less about what context is needed to sufficiently re- contextualize the experience of others, but instead about the scoped interaction between the user s and the system, where the user experience takes place during the interaction process itself.
For the experience process then, we feel the emphasis should be on model- ing the user and anticipated interaction with the system.
Staff Picks Searchable Acquisitions Table
These are discussed in detail below. Spatiotemporal Aspects: For the spatial aspects, participants were asked about where they were when they made a message Q1, Q4 , giving an indication about their experience at a place. Most messages were made in an urban setting, public place, or at the university,3 providing an indication as to the kinds of places future experience-capture technology would be used in. Also, despite that participants were asked to make messages outside of their homes, a few did not comply, which were classified under the Home category. For domain and task dependencies in an urban setting, most urban messages fell into the aesthetics domain category However, for inspiring days, all participants agreed that events provided a source of inspiration, where events included their weekend activities, such as going out for a drink.
Overall, these findings are consistent with the findings of Sohn et al. Social Aspects: Participants were asked about whether they wanted their MMs to be public visible to any- one at approximately the same location it was made or private viewable to only specified networks Burrell and Gay, , as well as who they were with at the time of making the message Q5. In analyzing who a participant was with, we defined a person as a single friend or family member and a group as a collection of friends or family members.
The foregoing results illustrate the difference between public and private messages, and messages made alone or with others. This is in contrast to the findings of Burrell and Gay , who found that notes posted voluntarily were mostly made private. This may be due to their misleading conceptual model that resulted in users treating the E-graffiti system as a limited e-mail system, where E-mail messages are gen- erally addressed to a few private individuals. While this may have been a coincidence, it is also not unlikely that when walking outdoors, participants still feel the need to record their experi- ence, even if alone e.
Affective and Cognitive Aspects: The mood responses Q3 of participants were classified according to valence positive, negative, neutral, ambivalent and arousal high, moderate, low , in accordance with the circumplex model of emotion Russell, For the overlap between negatively valenced moods and being alone, the diary may have functioned as a cathartic outlet for them to express their negative mood, which is also typical of web 2.
Together, these findings highlight the variability in mood states in everyday contexts, which do not exhibit strong overlap between the location of the experience and the MM. Moreover, we wanted to investigate the causal dependencies, if any, that exist between prior participant activity and the created messages. All partici- pants reported that indeed it did make them more aware insofar as they had to plan where to make a message.
As one participant P2 reported, the diary, if it were a pervasive mo- bile tool, would not make a difference in raising awareness if it were embedded in daily life. In contrast, P8 stated that the diary was effective in raising awareness by making him contemplate over the beautiful parts of the city he normally takes for granted. This raises the question of whether continuous cognitive access should be designed in an experience- capture tool, so that deliberate planning behavior becomes the norm.
Such a mechanism can serve as a persuasion tool to not only create meaningful MMs cf. Here, a situation was defined as a collection of objects that are a pretext for an event s or caused by an event s. Given this typology, it was assumed that if a participant did not direct her message at something spe- cific in the environment, then the trigger of the message was a situation.
The high frequency of situation-triggers is consistent with the findings of Persson and Fagerberg , who found that situation-related chat outnumbered object-related chat. Post-study Interview Responses Viewing and Adding Experience-based Metadata: During the post-study interview, participants were asked about what kind of metadata in- formation similar to that asked in the diary they would like to see if they were using an application that supported LMM. Afterwards, they were asked about their willingness to add this metadata themselves.
I would like a context between the message and an event, because the event might no longer be there, and then you would not know it happened at a location, so then it might not make sense. But it should be available if wanted All but one participant mentioned they would like the future LMM tool to automatically adapt the presentation of messages to their current situation. Only 2 participants, P1 and P2, specified explicitly the kind of adaptation they would like: filtering by current mood and by date, respectively. The other 5 did not explicitly specify the type of filter, but stated that adaptivity would be the preferred method of handling the hypothetically large number of messages at locations.
For example, great nature photos. This indicates that the problem of filling in metadata can be partially alleviated if potential users are aware of the consumption benefits provided by the metadata such as more fully grasping the original experience of the LMM creator. These two factors were chosen because they generally require elaborate responses to be contextually meaningful, and therefore are indicative of efforts from partic- ipants to fill in media metadata in general.
Motivation Length Environment Desc. Potential Application Usage Finally, during the post-study interview, participants were asked about what type of func- tionality and interaction they expect from future LMM tools. Also, nearly all participants mentioned they would like to comment on other messages as in Facebook6. Related to this, participants expect to be able to edit their own messages as well as delete them.
When asked whether or not they would actually use an LMM tool if one is available, all but one participant said they would.