Footnotes from the Archives of Genius

Bibliodeath: My Archives With Life In Footnotes () is not a writer's In An Involuntary Genius, Codrescu recalls sitting in a Romanian café with poetry friends.
Table of contents

Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations. View or edit your browsing history. Get to Know Us. English Choose a language for shopping. Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally.

Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources. Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids on the go. Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. Blanchard was known in the Village by her guests as a generous landlord because she exclusively rented to artists even though they were often late on rent. On her 80 th birthday, Village residents arranged for a procession around Washington Square Park in a horse drawn buggy.

But what a pity it is that it takes so many barrels of liquor to produce them. Blanchard passed away in However, after the buildings were demolished he rescinded his plan to build the apartment building and sold the property to New York University. The House of Genius in Greenwich Village never received landmark designation. It was demolished in and replaced by NYU housing. The campaign to save the House of Genius was one of the early preservation battles prior to the passing of the New York City Landmarks Law.

Local Greenwich Village residents along with community organizers fought for its protection based on its cultural and artistic significance. To leave this crucial aspect out of this entire bio is sort of an issue. There are two kinds of cult of the individual. One is correct, such as that of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and the correct side of Stalin. These we ought to revere and continue to revere forever.

Over 280,000 people receive our email newsletter

It would not do not to revere them. As they held truth in their hands, why should we not revere them? We believe in truth; truth is the reflection of objective existence.

A squad should revere its squad leader, it would be quite wrong not to. Then there is the incorrect kind of cult of the individual in which there is no analysis, simply blind obedience. This is not right. Opposition to the cult of the individual may also have one of two aims: The question at issue is not whether or not there should be a cult of the individual, but rather whether or not the individual concerned represents the truth.

If he does, then he should be revered. If truth is not present, even collective leadership will be no good. Throughout its history, our Party has stressed the combination of the role of the individual with collective leadership. The question of genius is a theoretical question. Their theory was idealist apriorism. Someone has said that to oppose genius is to oppose me. But I am no genius. I read Confucian books for six years and capitalist books for seven. I did not read Marxist-Leninist books until , so how can I be a genius?

It is not that I do not want to talk about genius. To be a genius is to be a bit more intelligent. But genius does not depend on one person or a few people. It depends on a party, the party which is the vanguard of the proletariat. Genius is dependent on the mass line, on collective wisdom I spoke to Comrade Lin Biao and some of the things he said were not very accurate. For example he said that a genius only appears in the world once in a few centuries and in China once in a few millennia.

Marx and Engels were contemporaries, and not one century had elapsed before we had Lenin and Stalin, so how could you say that a genius only appears once in a few centuries?

Release of collected papers of Albert Einstein give insight into a genius

One sentence is, after all, just one sentence, how can it be worth ten thousand sentences? We should not appoint a state chairman. I have said this six times already. If each time I said it I used one sentence, that is now the equivalent of sixty thousand sentences. But they never listen, so each of my sentences is not even worth half a sentence. In fact its value is zero.

You should study the article written by Lenin on the twenty-fifth anniversary of the death of Eugene Pottier. Let them not only be sung but also explained and acted upon.


  1. Talk:Mao Zedong/Archive 8.
  2. House of Genius | NYPAP;
  3. Flann O'Brien: lovable literary genius.
  4. House of Genius.
  5. DreamHealer 2 - A Guide to Healing and Self-Empowerment: Ebook!
  6. Emprego não cai do céu (Portuguese Edition).
  7. Let the Necessary Occur.

What they say is that slaves should arise and struggle for truth. There never has been any supreme saviour, nor can we rely on gods or emperors. We rely entirely on ourselves for our salvation. Who has created the world of human beings?

Why Are Some Periods and Places So Astonishingly More Productive than Others?

We the laboring masses. During the Lushan Conference I wrote a word article which raised the question of who created history, the heroes or the slaves.

Keeping in mind that Nehru was an important leader in Mao's political career, I am surprised that there is no section on him. We should have some information about his relationship with Nehru and India. I am more surprised that the article is not locked! For more, see http: Stable lead was modified in late November , after its relatively long stability. While much was clarified, one key paragraph was removed:. Mao's controversy is certainly worth mentioning in his introduction, but not as a single sentence, instead the sources of his controversy should be introduced as they were in the old lead.

Have fun -- Jerome Potts talk Is the article being vandalised because I was viewing some pictures which are unsourced. We need to warmly thank user User: Midnightblueowl for pushing the article ahead and improving the flow with careful edits. But I also have some suggestions for him or her to consider when making further edits and even more for future editors to consider in order to make their improvements enduring and easier for others to participate. First, although the Wikipedia policy Wikipedia: Schram was pioneering and on many points still has sensible judgments, but he published chapters in the Cambridge History of China which reflect his later thinking.

Carter is out of print, and besides, WorldCat describes it as "Biography: Carter is not a China scholar in any case and the book is a tertiary source, which is clearly not a "Reliable Source. Stanford University Press, The gold standard biography, available at a reasonable price, is now Alexander Pantsov, with Steven I Levine. I strongly suggest that anyone who wants to make further edits get hold of a copy and use it! Why does this matter? Although in fact, Schram Mao sent Liu Shaoqi to organize workers in the Anyuan mines, and Liu's success showed Mao what could be accomplished with this style of organizing.

During the Cultural Revolution one of the most widely copied paintings was Chairman Mao Goes to Anyuan ], but Liu was, of course, a capitalist roader and the painting [ Comrade Liu Shaoqi and the Anyuan Miners ] had to be desecrated. Pantsov and Levine To further show how scholarship progresses, the fullest study came out after Pantsov and Levine finished: Mining China's Revolutionary Tradition.

Whats using Purchasing Posting Examples In any case

University of California Press, The gist of the book is in the note to the passage excised from the article. Perry has too much detail to put into the Mao article, but she argues in weighty detail that the Anyuan incident adds significantly to the picture of how Mao developed, how orthodox history did not adequately describe it, and how even the best Western historians did not have the material or the perspectives to do it themselves. If there is this much difference on a seemingly minor event which turns out to be significant, then there is even more urgent need to use good recent work on larger points on which research and debate continues to produce new insights.

To return to my original point: In this spirit, I hope it will be OK if I restore the sentences on Anyuan, which I will Red Link in hopes that someone will use the material to write a brief Wikipedia article on the subject. Wikipedia policy does not call for two, three, or sometimes four footnotes or references for the same fact.

I am still filled with admiration and gratitude for the hard work and many hours which have gone into improving the Mao article, which is now far more balanced, readable, and comprehensive than in the beginning. Would it be easier to make changes in the references if we used direct referencing rather than the admittedly more elegant bibliography templates?

Cheers ch talk The paragraph describing Mao's death, including the very direct accusations that Jiang Qing hastened or even caused the Chairman's death, is completely unsupported. There are no citations whatsoever, and I can't find the account in this article in any of the print biographical resources I have on either party. The same information is repeated in Jiang Qing's main article, again with no citations. Does anyone have a resource to support this account? Hi, I am a college student writing a research paper on China's takeover of Tibet, so I came to Mao's page for some information but I don't see anything about Tibet on his page.

How come no one has written or mentioned anything about Tibet? I would do it myself but due to the security of the page I am not able to edit anything. I think it should be pointed out that Monthly Review is a radical-left publication. I'm all for dissenting opinions, but it's important to point out that the views expressed in this article and others like it run counter to a large body of studies of the GLF by professional historians.

I suggest changing the text to something like:. In contrast, radical left-wing journals such as the Monthly Review have disputed the reliability of the figures commonly cited, the qualitative evidence of a "massive death toll", and Mao's complicity in those deaths which occurred. I'm not sure if it's enough of a compromise perhaps socialist should be capitalized?

Podcast Archive | The Daily Zeitgeist

If this is going to be used as a source, can I put in the bit about Mao liking to be masturbated by a soldier in bed before he went to sleep? I think that it is beyond doubt that According to Mao's personal physician 1 Mao did not brush his teeth, but instead preferred to clean his teeth by rinsing his mouth out with tea.

Again I don't particularly care whether these details are included in the article.

Robin Hyde

They seem pretty minor when considering the totality of Mao's life. This talk page where the Chairman would be criticized is eerily silent. I mean it's really weird. I know we have some serious Left Wingers in this country, [ citation needed ] but people, this is not actually China even though Mao is a Chinese figure. Right Wingers should feel free to speak out and criticize Mao fairly.